161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10175533)
1. Bill introduced to repeal patient transfer provision.
Natl Rep Subacute Care; 1997 Nov; 5(24):1-2. PubMed ID: 10175533
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Discharge rule first to recognize subacute.
Hawryluk M
Provider; 1998 Aug; 24(8):25-6. PubMed ID: 10181658
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. HCFA reports impact of hospital-post acute transfer policy, may consider expanding to all DRGs.
Natl Rep Subacute Care; 2000 May; 8(10):1-4. PubMed ID: 11066241
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. HCFA to target transfers of patients from hospitals-within-hospitals.
Natl Rep Subacute Care; 1999 Jun; 7(11):1, 5-6. PubMed ID: 10538075
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Post-acute pain. Hospitals battle new inpatient-transfer policy.
Fong T
Mod Healthc; 2005 Aug; 35(32):10-1. PubMed ID: 16117076
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. HCFA announces 10 DRGs affected by "transfer rule".
Natl Rep Subacute Care; 1998 May; 6(10):8. PubMed ID: 10179900
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Transfer provision costing millions, study confirms.
Hosp Case Manag; 2000 Aug; 8(8):113-6. PubMed ID: 11183112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Transfer and discharge dilemmas.
Provider; 1994 Aug; 20(8):35-6. PubMed ID: 10135533
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. HCFA exempts swing beds from transfer rule; provider group worries about unfair advantage.
Natl Rep Subacute Care; 1998 Sep; 6(18):1-3. PubMed ID: 10185934
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Hospital transfers and discharges redefined.
Gundling RL
Healthc Financ Manage; 1998 Nov; 52(11):72-3. PubMed ID: 10187635
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. AHA to push for repeal of patient transfer provision.
Natl Rep Subacute Care; 1997 Oct; 5(20):1-2. PubMed ID: 10174572
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. CMS' changes to IPPS will affect your hospital's reimbursements.
Hosp Case Manag; 2005 Oct; 13(10):145-7. PubMed ID: 16218542
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. HCFA announces discharge billing changes for postacute care transfers.
Patient Acc; 1998 Sep; 21(9):1, 4. PubMed ID: 10183099
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. HCFA's new 'transfer DRGs' can cost your hospital money.
Birmingham J
Hosp Peer Rev; 1999 Apr; 24(4):59-61. PubMed ID: 10351062
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Proposed FY'06 IPPS: 3.2 percent market basket update, expanded transfer policy.
Hosp Outlook; 2005; 8(2):1, 16. PubMed ID: 16078375
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Transfer trauma. Hospitals oppose CMS plan to include more DRGs in controversial policy.
Tieman J
Mod Healthc; 2003 May; 33(20):24-5. PubMed ID: 12800584
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The impact of the rehabilitation prospective payment system on case management.
Matarelli SA
Case Manager; 2001; 12(2):53-6. PubMed ID: 11244403
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. New transfer rule encourages acute care partnerships.
Stahl DA
Nurs Manage; 1998 Dec; 29(12):10-1. PubMed ID: 9987360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Subacute providers advised to get ready now for impact of transfer rule.
Natl Rep Subacute Care; 1998 Feb; 6(4):4-6. PubMed ID: 10178767
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Prospective payment in long-term care--a new challenge in assessment and care planning.
Hebert M
Continuum; 1998; 18(6):1, 3-9. PubMed ID: 10558088
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
