These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
232 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10175744)
21. How the clinical customization of an EMR means good business: a case study of Queen City Physicians. Coyle-Toerner P; Collins L J Med Pract Manage; 2003; 19(1):27-31. PubMed ID: 12971002 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Factors influencing physician use of clinical electronic information technologies after adoption by their medical group practices. Kralewski JE; Dowd BE; Cole-Adeniyi T; Gans D; Malakar L; Elson B Health Care Manage Rev; 2008; 33(4):361-7. PubMed ID: 18815501 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. MIS priorities for MSO's (management services organization) & clinics without walls. Miller JL Integr Healthc Rep; 1994 Jan; ():7-9. PubMed ID: 10132217 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Effectively integrating your EMR initiative. Whitham JC; Davis S Physician Exec; 2007; 33(3):56-9. PubMed ID: 17539564 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Pain for trying. Physician scheduling software is a high yield investment. Ahlstrom RG Healthc Inform; 1998 Oct; 15(10):125. PubMed ID: 10185027 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Wooing physicians. Provider organizations are using a variety of strategies to persuade physicians to adopt electronic records in ambulatory care settings. McCormack J Health Data Manag; 1999 Oct; 7(10):56-8, 60, 62 passim. PubMed ID: 10622925 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. MDs ok CPRs, VPN and PDAs. Schuerenberg BK Health Data Manag; 2003 Feb; 11(2):116-8. PubMed ID: 12602292 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. The electronic medical record in multi-site family practice. Part II: The implementation phase. Blair D; Schutte PC J Med Pract Manage; 2003; 19(3):131-6. PubMed ID: 14730816 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Management services organizations make the most of information technology. Cross M Health Data Manag; 1997 Apr; 5(4):87-8, 90, 92. PubMed ID: 10166640 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Medical groups' adoption of electronic health records and information systems. Gans D; Kralewski J; Hammons T; Dowd B Health Aff (Millwood); 2005; 24(5):1323-33. PubMed ID: 16162580 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. The value of CPOE in ambulatory settings. Johnston D; Pan E; Walker J J Healthc Inf Manag; 2004; 18(1):5-8. PubMed ID: 14971070 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Electronic medical records. Rockower S Md Med; 2005; 6(4):19-21. PubMed ID: 16454435 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Electronic medical records make sense--at last. Terry K Med Econ; 1999 May; 76(10):134-6, 139-40, 145-6 passim. PubMed ID: 10537711 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. The dawn of computer age for home health care. Pierce C Health Data Manag; 1995 Oct; 3(9):61-4. PubMed ID: 10156243 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Time for physician groups to lead the way toward an electronic medical record. Hertzberg J Manag Care Interface; 2002 Jun; 15(6):63-4. PubMed ID: 12087609 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Integrated vs. interfaced practice management systems. Cairo AM Health Manag Technol; 1997 Sep; 18(10):47-9. PubMed ID: 10170222 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Physician practice management. What works. A one-two punch. Wertheimer DE Health Manag Technol; 2005 Jun; 26(6):14, 16. PubMed ID: 15981915 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Streamlining medical group operations through an integrated computer-based patient record. Jantos LD; May RR; Sheppard RL J Healthc Inf Manag; 1998; 12(3):89-101. PubMed ID: 10338791 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]