145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10175870)
1. Sharp shootin'. Texas doctors put HMOs in the malpractice target zone.
Guglielmo WJ
Med Econ; 1997 Dec; 74(25):88-90, 93-4, 97-9. PubMed ID: 10175870
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. ERISA update. Employee Retirement Income Security Act.
Sfikas PM
J Am Dent Assoc; 1998 Dec; 129(12):1754-5. PubMed ID: 9854928
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Crushing your health plan's legal protection.
Coleman DL
Bus Health; 1997 Aug; 15(8):40-2, 44-6. PubMed ID: 10170211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. ERISA and medical professional liability.
Griffen FD; Adelman SH
Bull Am Coll Surg; 1998 Jul; 83(7):16-21. PubMed ID: 10345205
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Managed care: Texas's Health Care Liability Act held partially preempted by ERISA.
Hauswirth M
J Law Med Ethics; 1998; 26(3):249-50. PubMed ID: 11066883
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The Texas Health Care Liability Act: Texas is the first state to listen to the concerns of its health care consumers, but how much has it heard?
McCabe KM
J Contemp Health Law Policy; 2000; 16(2):565-95. PubMed ID: 10970185
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. District court rules on Texas Health Care Liability Act.
Hansen E
Manag Care Interface; 1998 Nov; 11(11):87-8. PubMed ID: 10187421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The "Texas bill".
Ortolon K
Tex Med; 1998 Apr; 94(4):32-6. PubMed ID: 9564256
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Liability of managed care organizations expands.
Devlin MM
J Med Pract Manage; 1999; 15(3):150-3. PubMed ID: 10725048
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. What recourse? Liability for managed-care decisions and the Employee Retirement Income Security Act.
Mariner WK
N Engl J Med; 2000 Aug; 343(8):592-6. PubMed ID: 10954770
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. To sue or not to sue?
Spragins EE
Newsweek; 1996 Dec; 128(24):50. PubMed ID: 10162567
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Legal challenges to managed care: another view.
Hall MA
Health Aff (Millwood); 1999; 18(6):246-8. PubMed ID: 10650708
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Credentialing liability in the managed care arena.
Michel CP
Tort Insur Law J; 1999; 35(1):137-53. PubMed ID: 11475509
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The law that shields HMOs from the risk doctors face.
Coleman DL
Manag Care; 1997 May; 6(5):25-6, 35-8, 41. PubMed ID: 10168633
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Managed care liability and ERISA preemption.
Rakich JS; Ledbetter RK
Manag Care Q; 2000; 8(1):28-37. PubMed ID: 11009731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Case law update. State law negligence actions against MCOs are pre-empted by ERISA.
West JC
J Healthc Risk Manag; 2004; 24(3):37-42. PubMed ID: 20196010
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The Supreme Court and managed-care liability.
Zinberg JM
N Engl J Med; 2005 Jan; 352(2):201-3; author reply 201-3. PubMed ID: 15651122
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Emerging legal issues.
Marren JP
Manag Care Q; 1998; 6(2):59-64. PubMed ID: 10181707
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Cracks in the wall. Court decisions penetrate ERISA's invulnerability.
Borges W
Tex Med; 2003 Mar; 99(3):35-9. PubMed ID: 12674976
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Physician liability and managed care: a philosophical perspective.
Fine DK
Ga State Univ Law Rev; 2003; 19(3):641-703. PubMed ID: 15214340
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
