178 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10175941)
1. New threat to HMOs. Bill to amend ERISA would allow patients to sue.
Gardner J
Mod Healthc; 1998 Jan; 28(4):38. PubMed ID: 10175941
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Vicarious liability: is ERISA preemption a successful defense?
Lederberg MB
Med Health R I; 1997 Feb; 80(2):69-70. PubMed ID: 9046780
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. ERISA shield is cracked; HMOs open to liability. Improves legal atmosphere for physicians, patients. Employee Retirement Income Security Act.
Pa Med; 1999 Feb; 102(2):1-2. PubMed ID: 10070189
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Groping for the reins: ERISA, HMO malpractice, and enterprise liability.
Kilcullen JK
Am J Law Med; 1996; 22(1):7-50. PubMed ID: 8819595
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. ERISA. Employee Retirement Income Security Act.
Berlin L
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2000 Jan; 174(1):19-25. PubMed ID: 10628447
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The law that shields HMOs from the risk doctors face.
Coleman DL
Manag Care; 1997 May; 6(5):25-6, 35-8, 41. PubMed ID: 10168633
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. ERISA-HMOs are using the law against the people it was designed to protect.
D'Ambrosia R
Orthopedics; 1997 May; 20(5):393. PubMed ID: 9172244
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. High court rules ERISA pre-empts negligence claims against HMOs.
Sfikas PM
J Am Dent Assoc; 2004 Oct; 135(10):1480-2. PubMed ID: 15551991
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Supreme Court to decide whether ERISA pre-empts negligence claims against HMOs.
Sfikas PM
J Am Dent Assoc; 2004 Jan; 135(1):110-2. PubMed ID: 14959884
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The people vs HMOs.
Howe RF
Time; 1999 Feb; 153(4):46-7. PubMed ID: 10345773
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Doctors, HMOs, ERISA, and the public interest after Pegram v. Hendrich.
Stempel JW; von Magdenko N
Tort Insur Law J; 2001; 36(3):687-734. PubMed ID: 11939225
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. ERISA preemption remains on the front burner.
Hosp Law Newsl; 2004 Mar; 21(5):1-6. PubMed ID: 15011608
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Texas breaks new ground.
Moran T
Tex Med; 1998 Dec; 94(12):58-61. PubMed ID: 9854419
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Health plan liability.
Coleman D
Healthplan; 1997; 38(2):77-81. PubMed ID: 10176856
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Marketplace. State lawmakers consider keeping HMOs in line through malpractice suits.
Moskowitz DB
Med Health; 1998 Feb; 52(6):suppl 1-2. PubMed ID: 10176439
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Courts reject ERISA and Medicare preemption defenses.
Hosp Law Newsl; 1999 Apr; 16(6):5-7. PubMed ID: 10351072
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Workers of the world, panic!
Parloff R
Fortune; 2004 Jul; 150(1):36, 38. PubMed ID: 15270460
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Mining a new legal theory.
Moran T
Tex Med; 1999 Feb; 95(2):28-30. PubMed ID: 10025178
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Pegram v. Herdrich. A recent U.S. Supreme Court decision threatens patients and physicians.
Geist RW
Minn Med; 2002 Jul; 85(7):6, 58-9. PubMed ID: 12152532
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Preemption of a state "legislatively created" right to sue HMOs for negligence. Corporate Health Ins. Inc. v. Texas Dept. of Insurance.
Jordan KA
Health Care Law Mon; 1999 Apr; ():13-24. PubMed ID: 10351769
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
