176 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10176776)
1. Theories of justice and their implications for priority setting in health care.
Olsen JA
J Health Econ; 1997 Dec; 16(6):625-39. PubMed ID: 10176776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Acceptable health and priority weighting: Discussing a reference-level approach using sufficientarian reasoning.
Wouters S; van Exel NJA; Rohde KIM; Vromen JJ; Brouwer WBF
Soc Sci Med; 2017 May; 181():158-167. PubMed ID: 28402905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Justice and solidarity in priority setting in health care.
Hoedemaekers R; Dekkers W
Health Care Anal; 2003 Dec; 11(4):325-43. PubMed ID: 14769014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Exploring distributive justice in health care.
Capp S; Savage S; Clarke V
Aust Health Rev; 2001; 24(2):40-4. PubMed ID: 11496470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Dentistry and distributive justice.
Dharamsi S; MacEntee MI
Soc Sci Med; 2002 Jul; 55(2):323-9. PubMed ID: 12144145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Principles of justice in health care rationing.
Cookson R; Dolan P
J Med Ethics; 2000 Oct; 26(5):323-9. PubMed ID: 11055033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Societal preferences for distributive justice in the allocation of health care resources: a latent class discrete choice experiment.
Skedgel C; Wailoo A; Akehurst R
Med Decis Making; 2015 Jan; 35(1):94-105. PubMed ID: 25145575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Equality, explicitness, severity, and rigidity: the Oregon plan evaluated from a Scandinavian perspective.
Hansson LF; Norheim OF; Ruyter KW
J Med Philos; 1994 Aug; 19(4):343-66. PubMed ID: 7996073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Concerns for the worse off: fair innings versus severity.
Nord E
Soc Sci Med; 2005 Jan; 60(2):257-63. PubMed ID: 15522483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Fairness, accountability for reasonableness, and the views of priority setting decision-makers.
Martin DK; Giacomini M; Singer PA
Health Policy; 2002 Sep; 61(3):279-90. PubMed ID: 12098521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Rationing and life-saving treatments: should identifiable patients have higher priority?
Hope T
J Med Ethics; 2001 Jun; 27(3):179-85. PubMed ID: 11417026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The second phase of priority setting. Fairness as a problem of love and the heart: a clinician's perspective on priority setting.
Sabin JE
BMJ; 1998 Oct; 317(7164):1002-4. PubMed ID: 9841022
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Equity considerations in health care: the relevance of claims.
Cuadras-Morató X; Pinto-Prades JL; Abellán-Perpiñán JM
Health Econ; 2001 Apr; 10(3):187-205. PubMed ID: 11288186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The Oregon initiative: ethics and priority setting.
Callahan D
Health Matrix Clevel; 1991; 1(2):157-70; discussion 171-4. PubMed ID: 10120171
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. QALYS and ethics: a health economist's perspective.
Williams A
Soc Sci Med; 1996 Dec; 43(12):1795-804. PubMed ID: 8961422
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Health care priority setting in Norway a multicriteria decision analysis.
Defechereux T; Paolucci F; Mirelman A; Youngkong S; Botten G; Hagen TP; Niessen LW
BMC Health Serv Res; 2012 Feb; 12():39. PubMed ID: 22335815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Health utility indices and equity considerations.
Bleichrodt H
J Health Econ; 1997 Feb; 16(1):65-91. PubMed ID: 10167345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Needs, rights, and equity: more quality in healthcare rationing.
Doyal L
Qual Health Care; 1995 Dec; 4(4):273-83. PubMed ID: 10156398
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Lifetime QALY prioritarianism in priority setting.
Ottersen T
J Med Ethics; 2013 Mar; 39(3):175-80. PubMed ID: 23204320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Allocating scarce resources: a question of distributive justice. Part I.
Stogre FM
CHAC Rev; 1997; 25(3):10-3. PubMed ID: 10176060
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
