These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

174 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10176776)

  • 21. Child health and theories of right allocation.
    Veatch RM
    Health Matrix Clevel; 1994; 4(1):75-92. PubMed ID: 10142179
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Distributive justice and the introduction of generic medicines.
    Rego G; Brandão C; Melo H; Nunes R
    Health Care Anal; 2002; 10(2):221-9. PubMed ID: 12216747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. A framework for luck egalitarianism in health and healthcare.
    Albertsen A; Knight C
    J Med Ethics; 2015 Feb; 41(2):165-9. PubMed ID: 24505116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Principles for priority setting in mental health services and their implications for the least well off.
    Rosenheck RA
    Psychiatr Serv; 1999 May; 50(5):653-8. PubMed ID: 10332901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Priority setting in health care: learning from international experience.
    Ham C
    Health Policy; 1997 Oct; 42(1):49-66. PubMed ID: 10173493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Responsibility, fairness and rationing in health care.
    Cappelen AW; Norheim OF
    Health Policy; 2006 May; 76(3):312-9. PubMed ID: 16112248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A new proposal for priority setting in Norway: Open and fair.
    Ottersen T; Førde R; Kakad M; Kjellevold A; Melberg HO; Moen A; Ringard Å; Norheim OF
    Health Policy; 2016 Mar; 120(3):246-51. PubMed ID: 26851991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Obligation to the least well off in setting mental health service priorities: a consensus statement.
    Rosenheck R; Armstrong M; Callahan D; Dea R; Del Vecchio P; Flynn L; Fox RC; Goldman HH; Horvath T; Munoz R
    Psychiatr Serv; 1998 Oct; 49(10):1273-4, 1290. PubMed ID: 9779894
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Against lifetime QALY prioritarianism.
    Herlitz A
    J Med Ethics; 2018 Feb; 44(2):109-113. PubMed ID: 28993423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Ethics and priority setting in Oregon.
    Callahan D
    Health Aff (Millwood); 1991; 10(2):78-87. PubMed ID: 1885149
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Priority-setting in healthcare: a framework for reasonable clinical judgements.
    Baerøe K
    J Med Ethics; 2009 Aug; 35(8):488-96. PubMed ID: 19644007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Priority-setting in New Zealand: translating principles into practice.
    Ashton T; Cumming J; Devlin N
    J Health Serv Res Policy; 2000 Jul; 5(3):170-5. PubMed ID: 11183628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Adoption of new health care services in Norway (1993-1997): specialists' self-assessment according to national criteria for priority setting.
    Norheim OF; Ekeberg O; Evensen SA; Halvorsen M; Kvernebo K
    Health Policy; 2001 Apr; 56(1):65-79. PubMed ID: 11230909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The second phase of priority setting. Goodbye to the simple solutions: the second phase of priority setting in health care.
    Holm S
    BMJ; 1998 Oct; 317(7164):1000-2. PubMed ID: 9841021
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Issues on Luck Egalitarianism, Responsibility, and Intercultural Healthcare Policies.
    De Hoyos A
    Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 2016 Apr; 25(2):186-96. PubMed ID: 26957444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Public spending on health care: how are different criteria related? A second opinion.
    Jack W
    Health Policy; 2000 Aug; 53(1):61-7. PubMed ID: 10940463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Rational rationing?
    Mullen PM
    Health Serv Manage Res; 1998 May; 11(2):113-23. PubMed ID: 10181378
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Disease control priorities for neglected tropical diseases: lessons from priority ranking based on the quality of evidence, cost effectiveness, severity of disease, catastrophic health expenditures, and loss of productivity.
    Strømme EM; Baerøe K; Norheim OF
    Dev World Bioeth; 2014 Dec; 14(3):132-41. PubMed ID: 23724925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Priority care for employees: a blessing in disguise?
    Brouwer WB; Schut FT
    Health Econ; 1999 Feb; 8(1):65-73. PubMed ID: 10082144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Burden of illness estimates for priority setting: a debate revisited.
    Wiseman V; Mooney G
    Health Policy; 1998 Mar; 43(3):243-51. PubMed ID: 10178574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.