BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10177193)

  • 1. Don't be a D.R.I.P.
    Tellis-Nayak M
    Provider; 1998 Mar; 24(3):67, 69. PubMed ID: 10177193
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Nursing homes finally get report cards.
    Comarow A
    US News World Rep; 2002 May; 132(15):55. PubMed ID: 12001783
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Questionable quality initiative. Nursing homes frustrated with CMS measures.
    Duff S
    Mod Healthc; 2002 May; 32(20):20-1. PubMed ID: 12048836
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. S.D. nursing homes in outcomes project.
    Gardner J
    Mod Healthc; 1996 Jun; 26(25):24, 30. PubMed ID: 10157998
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Measuring quality with QMs.
    Simon S; LaBelle S; Littlehale S
    Provider; 2003 Feb; 29(2):37-40, 43. PubMed ID: 12640921
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Strategies to defend against quality of care allegations.
    Senft DJ
    Geriatr Nurs; 2008; 29(4):227-9. PubMed ID: 18694697
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Quality indicators shift survey focus.
    Hawryluk M
    Provider; 1999 Jun; 25(6):25-6, 29. PubMed ID: 10538129
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Nursing homes resist release of consumer guides.
    Robinson ML
    Hospitals; 1988 May; 62(9):26, 28. PubMed ID: 3360427
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. No pain, all gain. The new nursing home consumer quality measures present several challenges to today's long-term care facilities. Is yours ready?
    Clark TR
    Contemp Longterm Care; 2003 Feb; 26(2):40, 42. PubMed ID: 12669605
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Measures, indicators, & improvement of quality of life in nursing homes--Health Care Financing Administration.
    MacLaughlin-Frandsen B
    Director; 2001; 9(1):18. PubMed ID: 15307349
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Internet ratings: data without context.
    Burgess KL
    Provider; 2003 Apr; 29(4):39-41. PubMed ID: 12708248
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. From my perspective.
    Russell TR
    Bull Am Coll Surg; 2004 May; 89(5):3-4. PubMed ID: 18435101
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Getting ready for MDS 3.0: patient evaluation takes a new turn.
    Martin CM
    Consult Pharm; 2010 Jul; 25(7):404-6, 411-5. PubMed ID: 20601346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. IT's not just for hospitals. Long-term-care facilities have distinct needs for information systems.
    Robeznieks A
    Mod Healthc; 2005 Oct; 35(42):34, 36. PubMed ID: 16274194
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Five minutes with Bruce Vladeck. Interview by Elise Nakhnikian.
    Vladeck B
    Contemp Longterm Care; 1997 Jun; 20(6):100, 99. PubMed ID: 10169196
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Working the web. Massachusetts providers lobby for better online survey.
    Bonifazi WL
    Contemp Longterm Care; 1999 Jul; 22(7):25. PubMed ID: 10539184
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Linking data and quality in the age of computers.
    Wagner L
    Provider; 1996 Mar; 22(3):44-5, 47-8, 51-2 passim. PubMed ID: 10156734
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. High standards. Skewed survey nails nursing homes.
    Blesch G
    Mod Healthc; 2008 Oct; 38(40):14. PubMed ID: 18975399
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Can HCFA's quality indicators really identity poor care?
    LTC Regul Risk Liabil Advis; 2001 Mar; 9(5):1-4. PubMed ID: 11261366
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparative performance data now ready for use.
    Hosp Peer Rev; 2003 Dec; 28(12):165-6, 171. PubMed ID: 14692383
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.