These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10177578)
1. Recent developments in domestic partner benefits. Davis E Empl Benefits J; 1998 Mar; 23(1):40-2. PubMed ID: 10177578 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Same-sex spousal benefits: a Canadian perspective. Smithies R; vandenHoven N Empl Benefits J; 1994 Dec; 19(4):29-31. PubMed ID: 10141065 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Current developments in employee benefits. Amending qualified plans for tax reform. Schultz PT; Klein JP Employee Relat Law J; 1989; 14(4):643-51. PubMed ID: 10295814 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Section 89--its potential impact on you and your employees. Owen SF Text Rent; 1989 Jul; 72(11):60, 62. PubMed ID: 10294057 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Employer health coverage for domestic partners--identifying the issues. Laarman LM Employee Relat Law J; 1993; 18(4):567-80. PubMed ID: 10123813 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. On the fringe--1985 could be the year Congress zeroes in on employee benefits. Clark TB Natl J (Wash); 1984 Jul; 16(28):1356-61. PubMed ID: 10266838 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. TAMRA (Technical and Miscellaneous Revenue Act of 1988) changes to employee benefits and compensation. Meadors GM J Med Pract Manage; 1989; 4(3):181-2. PubMed ID: 10291897 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Effects of the 1986 Tax Reform Act on employee benefit plans of home health agencies. Clingan V Home Care Econ; 1987; 1(1):20-4. PubMed ID: 10283086 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. San Francisco hospital reports smooth sailing for domestic partner benefits. Healthc Hum Resour; 1993 Dec; 2(12):8-9. PubMed ID: 10135953 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Analyzing the IRS storm front. Controversy rages over Section 89. Granow LS; Wade D Adm Radiol; 1989 Oct; 8(10):43, 45, 47. PubMed ID: 10296067 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. New IRS Section 89 rules. The effect on home health agencies. Moll JH Caring; 1989 Mar; 8(3):50-2, 54. PubMed ID: 10292355 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. COBRA and tax implications of domestic partner coverage. Carlson GW; Goodwin SE Empl Benefits J; 1993 Jun; 18(2):6-10. PubMed ID: 10126129 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Sounding Board. Health-related tax subsidies: government handouts for the affluent. Brandon WP N Engl J Med; 1982 Oct; 307(15):947-50. PubMed ID: 7050720 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Tax Equity and Fiscal Responsibility Act of 1982: its impact on employee benefits. Shultz PT; Klein JP Employee Relat Law J; 1982-1983 Winter; 8(3):519-25. PubMed ID: 10259907 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Human resource information systems: helping to meet Section 89 requirements. Spirig JE Employ Relat Today; 1989; 16(1):9-16. PubMed ID: 10295776 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. State constitutional law - same-sex relations - Supreme Court of Michigan holds that public employers may not provide healthcare benefits to same-sex domestic partners of employees. - National Pride at Work, Inc. v. Governor of Michigan, 748 N.W.2d 524 (Mich. 2008). Harv Law Rev; 2009 Feb; 122(4):1263-70. PubMed ID: 19288616 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]