556 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10177950)
1. Policy on 180-day marketing exclusivity for drugs marketed under abbreviated new drug applications; clarification--FDA. Clarification.
Fed Regist; 1997 Nov; 62(229):63268-9. PubMed ID: 10177950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Potential pathways for abbreviated approval of generic biologics under existing law and proposed reforms to the law.
Dinh TQ
Food Drug Law J; 2007; 62(1):77-137. PubMed ID: 17444027
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Drug marketing exclusivity under United States and European Union law.
Junod V
Food Drug Law J; 2004; 59(4):479-518. PubMed ID: 15875347
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. A new history and discussion of 180-day exclusivity.
Korn DE; Lietzan E; Scott SW
Food Drug Law J; 2009; 64(2):335-90. PubMed ID: 19999288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Applications for FDA approval to market a dew drug: patent submission and listing requirements and application of 30-month stays on approval of abbreviated new drug applications certifying that a patent claiming a drug is invalid or will not be infringed. Final rule.
Food and Drug Administration, HHS
Fed Regist; 2003 Jun; 68(117):36675-712. PubMed ID: 12814136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. 2004 update--180-day exclusivity under the Hatch-Waxman amendments to the federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act.
Lietzan EK
Food Drug Law J; 2004; 59(4):459-63. PubMed ID: 15875350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Issues in the interpretation of 180-day exclusivity.
Lietzan E; Korn DE
Food Drug Law J; 2007; 62(1):49-75. PubMed ID: 17444026
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. A brief history of 180-day exclusivity under the Hatch-Waxman Amendments to the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act.
Lietzan EK
Food Drug Law J; 2004; 59(2):287-323. PubMed ID: 15298013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. New drugs for human use; clarification of requirements for patent holder notification--FDA. Proposed rule.
Fed Regist; 1998 Mar; 63(44):11174-7. PubMed ID: 10177511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. New drug applications and abbreviated new drug applications; technical amendment. Final rule; technical amendment.
Food and Drug Administration, HHS
Fed Regist; 2009 Mar; 74(43):9765-6. PubMed ID: 19418639
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The Drug Price Competition and Patent Term Restoration Act of 1984: fine-tuning the balance between the interests of pioneer and generic drug manufacturers.
Soehnge H
Food Drug Law J; 2003; 58(1):51-80. PubMed ID: 12739584
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. An Administrative Meter Maid: Using Inter Partes Review and Post-Grant Review to Curb Exclusivity Parking via the "Failure to Market" Provision of the Hatch-Waxman Act.
Apel BT
Mich Law Rev; 2015; 114(1):107-36. PubMed ID: 26394458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The emerging effects of the Drug Price Competition and Patent Term Restoration Act of 1984.
Lewis RA
J Contemp Health Law Policy; 1992; 8():361-78. PubMed ID: 10118987
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Unsettling drug patent settlements: a framework for presumptive illegality.
Carrier MA
Mich Law Rev; 2009 Oct; 108(1):37-80. PubMed ID: 20535881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The Food and Drug Administration and patent law at a crossroads: the listing of polymorph patents as a barrier to generic drug entry.
Srivastava D
Food Drug Law J; 2004; 59(2):339-54. PubMed ID: 15298015
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Balancing US patent and FDA approval processes: strategically optimizing market exclusivity.
Fernandez DS; Huie JT
Drug Discov Today; 2004 Jun; 9(12):509-12. PubMed ID: 15183155
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Repercussions of the Drug Price Competition and Patent Term Restoration Act of 1984.
Hogan GF
Am J Hosp Pharm; 1985 Apr; 42(4):849-51. PubMed ID: 4014238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. FDA's proposed rules on patent listing requirements for new drug and 30-month stays on ANDA approval (proposed Oct. 24, 2002).
Hui YF
Ann Health Law; 2003; 12(2):325-40, table of contents. PubMed ID: 12856462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Striking the right balance between innovation and drug price competition: understanding the Hatch-Waxman Act--an introduction of speakers.
Rea TS
Food Drug Law J; 1999; 54(2):223-5. PubMed ID: 11759713
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. A precarious balancing act--the role of the FDA as protector of public health and industry wealth.
McCabe AR
Suffolk Univ Law Rev; 2003; 36(3):787-819. PubMed ID: 16493844
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
