463 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10178391)
1. The secret life of the dominant form of managed care: self-insured ERISA networks.
Weller CD
Health Matrix Clevel; 1996; 6(2):305-48. PubMed ID: 10178391
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Coverage decisions versus the quality of care: an analysis of recent ERISA judicial decisions and their implications for employer-insured individuals.
Rosenbaum S; Teitelbaum J
Issue Brief George Wash Univ Cent Health Serv Res Policy; 2000 Apr; (8):1-15. PubMed ID: 12426709
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. What is an employee benefit plan?: ERISA preemption of "any willing provider" laws after Pegram.
Goodyear J
Columbia Law Rev; 2001 Jun; 101(5):1107-39. PubMed ID: 11942337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Profusion of health care laws creates compliance problems for health plans.
Carroll J
Manag Care; 2002 Sep; 11(9):10-2. PubMed ID: 12369342
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Patient choice organizations: the next generation after capitation and managed care.
Weller CD
Manag Care Q; 1998; 6(3):53-66. PubMed ID: 10182532
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. A practical guide to preemption for self-insured plans.
Wallace AM
Benefits Q; 1998; 14(2):39-41. PubMed ID: 10179243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The Supreme Court's limitation of managed-care liability.
Mariner WK
N Engl J Med; 2004 Sep; 351(13):1347-52. PubMed ID: 15385665
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Health care in Hawaiì: an agenda for research and reform.
Law SA
Am J Law Med; 2000; 26(2-3):205-23. PubMed ID: 10953772
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Will ERISA be the death knell for managed care?
Meadors GM
J Med Pract Manage; 2000; 15(5):264-6. PubMed ID: 10915519
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. ERISA and managed care: the law abhors a vacuum.
Farrell MG
J Health Hosp Law; 1996 Dec; 29(5):268-87. PubMed ID: 10164235
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. State regulation of managed care and the Employee Retirement Income Security Act.
Mariner WK
N Engl J Med; 1996 Dec; 335(26):1986-90. PubMed ID: 8960481
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Undermining ERISA.
Borges W
Tex Med; 2000 Aug; 96(8):34-8. PubMed ID: 10948835
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Health care reform ... unprecedented shift to managed care.
Mandelker J
State Health Care Am; 1995; ():8-13. PubMed ID: 10168077
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Clash of the Titans: State All-Payer Claims Reporting Systems Meet ERISA Preemption.
Rosenbaum S
Milbank Q; 2015 Dec; 93(4):683-6. PubMed ID: 26626981
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. ERISA update: the Supreme Court Texas decision and other recent developments.
Butler PA
State Coverage Initiat Issue Brief; 2004 Aug; 5(2):1-7. PubMed ID: 15298011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Managed care's Crimea: medical necessity, therapeutic benefit, and the goals of administrative process in health insurance.
Sage WM
Duke Law J; 2003 Nov; 53(2):597-651. PubMed ID: 15241875
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Redefining private insurance in a changing market structure.
Chollet DJ
Baxter Health Policy Rev; 1996; 2():33-62. PubMed ID: 11066265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. COBRA for state and local governmental plans.
Cabral AB
Empl Benefits J; 2003 Dec; 28(4):34-8. PubMed ID: 14712734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Marketplace. New U.S. appeals court ruling opens wide holes in ERISA preemption.
Moskowitz DB
Med Health; 1998 Jul; 52(28):suppl 1-2. PubMed ID: 10181086
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. ERISA preemption and regulation of managed health care: the case for managed federalism.
Farrell MG
Am J Law Med; 1997; 23(2-3):251-89. PubMed ID: 9262757
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
