333 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10178786)
1. Direct radiography can boost radiology productivity, cut costs.
Health Care Cost Reengineering Rep; 1998 Mar; 3(3):38-42. PubMed ID: 10178786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A new approach to RIS/DR interconnection.
Hayes B
Radiol Manage; 1999; 21(2):44-7. PubMed ID: 10351742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. An evaluation of the financial impacts of optical disk storage for digital radiography.
Stockburger WT
Radiol Manage; 1987; 9(4):35-9. PubMed ID: 10284737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Digital x-ray systems. Part 2. An overview of digital radiography concepts and an evaluation of cassetteless DX systems.
Health Devices; 2001 Nov; 30(11):381-401. PubMed ID: 11770228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Mobile radiography CQI: an inter-national study.
Kamat MR; Wein B; Cohan R
Adm Radiol J; 1999; 18(6-7):18. PubMed ID: 12528653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Film-free efficiency systems: a new cost-effective approach.
Reicher MA
Radiol Manage; 1998; 20(5):51-5. PubMed ID: 10186419
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Successful purchasing strategies involve radiology administrators, materiel managers and suppliers.
Hanwell LL; Haythorn RJ
Radiol Manage; 1993; 15(2):31-4. PubMed ID: 10126668
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The path of least resistance: is there a better route?
Loree A; Maihack M; Powell M
Radiol Manage; 2003; 25(5):48-51. PubMed ID: 14603594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Taking digital imaging to the next level: challenges and opportunities.
Hobbs WC
Radiol Manage; 2004; 26(2):16-20. PubMed ID: 15098897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The challenge of PACS in a small hospital.
Cartier M
Radiol Manage; 1999; 21(4):23-5, 28. PubMed ID: 10558030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [The amorphous selenium based flat-panel detector. Clinical experiences].
Schmidt EL; Herbig W
Radiologe; 2003 May; 43(5):374-8. PubMed ID: 12764586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cost modeling as a technology assessment tool for radiology department capital equipment acquisitions.
Marion JL; Vanden Brink JA
J Healthc Resour Manag; 1996 Jun; 14(5):8-13. PubMed ID: 10158615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Increased productivity of a digital imaging system: one hospital's experience.
Sack D
Radiol Manage; 2001; 23(6):14-8. PubMed ID: 11793559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Achieving the promise of PACS today.
Paulsen D
J Healthc Mater Manage; 1994 Apr; 12(4):25, 28-9. PubMed ID: 10134610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Designing the future of imaging & technology.
Davis GC
Adm Radiol J; 2000; 19(5-6):26-9. PubMed ID: 11183922
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Capital planning in radiology.
Thrall JH
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1992 Nov; 159(5):1107-11. PubMed ID: 1414785
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Radiology project delivers 16% cut in costs per exam.
Health Care Cost Reengineering Rep; 1998 Sep; 3(9):129-32. PubMed ID: 10185341
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. 2002 medical imaging time capsule.
Tye GA
Radiol Manage; 2002; 24(6):56. PubMed ID: 12510612
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Leaders of the PACS in radiology. Clinical imaging technology helps hospitals enhance accuracy, savings, service.
Hensley S
Mod Healthc; 1999 Nov; 29(48):54-6, 58. PubMed ID: 10662207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Image is everything. New York Hospital's institution-wide digital imaging lowers costs and improves care.
Scalzi G; Sostman HD
Healthc Inform; 1998 Mar; 15(3):91-4. PubMed ID: 10177701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
