BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

97 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10179716)

  • 1. Use of wavelet analysis for contrast enhancement in mammography.
    Sakellaropoulos P; Costaridou L; Cavouras D; Bezerianos A; Panayiotakis G
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 1997; 43 Pt B():502-6. PubMed ID: 10179716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A wavelet-based spatially adaptive method for mammographic contrast enhancement.
    Sakellaropoulos P; Costaridou L; Panayiotakis G
    Phys Med Biol; 2003 Mar; 48(6):787-803. PubMed ID: 12699195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Analyser-based mammography using single-image reconstruction.
    Briedis D; Siu KK; Paganin DM; Pavlov KM; Lewis RA
    Phys Med Biol; 2005 Aug; 50(15):3599-611. PubMed ID: 16030385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Detection of microcalcifications in digital mammograms using wavelets.
    Wang TC; Karayiannis NB
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 1998 Aug; 17(4):498-509. PubMed ID: 9845306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Improvement of detectability of microcalcifications by magnification digital mammography].
    Higashida Y; Hatemura M; Yoshida A; Takada T; Takahashi M
    Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 1998 Aug; 58(9):473-8. PubMed ID: 9778932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Digital mammography: hybrid four-channel wavelet transform for microcalcification segmentation.
    Qian W; Clarke LP; Song D; Clark RA
    Acad Radiol; 1998 May; 5(5):354-64. PubMed ID: 9597103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Digital full field mammography: physical principles and clinical aspects].
    Säbel M; Aichinger U; Schulz-Wendtland R; Bautz W
    Rontgenpraxis; 1999; 52(5-6):171-7. PubMed ID: 10574025
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of microcalcifications segmentation techniques for dense breast digitized images.
    Góes CE; Schiabel H; Nunes FL
    J Digit Imaging; 2002; 15 Suppl 1():231-3. PubMed ID: 12105737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Detection of microcalcifications by means of multiscale methods and statistical techniques.
    Mata Campos R; Vidal EM; Nava E; Martínez-Morillo M; Sendra F
    J Digit Imaging; 2000 May; 13(2 Suppl 1):221-5. PubMed ID: 10847410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Normalization of local contrast in mammograms.
    Veldkamp WJ; Karssemeijer N
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2000 Jul; 19(7):731-8. PubMed ID: 11055788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Digital mammography: M-channel quadrature mirror filters (QMFs) for microcalcification extraction.
    Qian W; Clarke LP; Li HD; Clark R; Silbiger ML
    Comput Med Imaging Graph; 1994; 18(5):301-14. PubMed ID: 7954307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Detection of clustered microcalcifications in small field digital mammography.
    Arodź T; Kurdziel M; Popiela TJ; Sevre EO; Yuen DA
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2006 Jan; 81(1):56-65. PubMed ID: 16310282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Scale-space signatures for the detection of clustered microcalculations in digital mammograms.
    Netsch T; Peitgen HO
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 1999 Sep; 18(9):774-86. PubMed ID: 10571382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Computer-aided diagnosis in the detection of simulated clustered microcalcifications on mammography].
    Horino K
    Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 1998 Jun; 58(7):343-8. PubMed ID: 9711073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Characterization of a cluster of microcalcifications on digital mammography: back to basic concepts].
    Taourel P
    J Radiol; 2010 Sep; 91(9 Pt 1):837-8. PubMed ID: 20814372
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Digital imaging in the surgical detection of breast neoplasms].
    Rulli A; Cirocchi R; Carli L; Cagini L
    G Chir; 1993 Dec; 14(9):483-7. PubMed ID: 8167081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Vibro-acoustic tissue mammography.
    Fatemi M; Wold LE; Alizad A; Greenleaf JF
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2002 Jan; 21(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 11838661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [ROC analysis of image quality in digital luminescence radiography in comparison with current film-screen systems in mammography].
    Wiebringhaus R; John V; Müller RD; Hirche H; Voss M; Callies R
    Aktuelle Radiol; 1995 Jul; 5(4):263-7. PubMed ID: 7548257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Fractal modeling and segmentation for the enhancement of microcalcifications in digital mammograms.
    Li H; Liu KJ; Lo SC
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 1997 Dec; 16(6):785-98. PubMed ID: 9533579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Breast calcifications: analysis of imaging properties.
    Olson SL; Fam BW; Winter PF; Scholz FJ; Lee AK; Gordon SE
    Radiology; 1988 Nov; 169(2):329-32. PubMed ID: 3174980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.