153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10179719)
1. A model for image formation and image quality prediction in diagnostic radiology.
Kandarakis I; Cavouras D; Koutsourakis C; Triantis D; Bakas A; Panayiotakis G; Nomicos C
Stud Health Technol Inform; 1997; 43 Pt B():517-21. PubMed ID: 10179719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A comparison between objective and subjective image quality measurements for a full field digital mammography system.
Marshall NW
Phys Med Biol; 2006 May; 51(10):2441-63. PubMed ID: 16675862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. An examination of automatic exposure control regimes for two digital radiography systems.
Marshall NW
Phys Med Biol; 2009 Aug; 54(15):4645-70. PubMed ID: 19590115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The application of image quality measurements for digital angiography.
Peterzol A; Padovani R; Quai E; Vano E; Prieto C; Aviles P
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 117(1-3):38-43. PubMed ID: 16461533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Measurement of the detective quantum efficiency (DQE) of digital X-ray detectors according to the novel standard IEC 62220-1.
Illers H; Buhr E; Hoeschen C
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):39-44. PubMed ID: 15933079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [The physical aspects of traditional radiology and of computed radiology compared].
Bacarini L; Giacomich R; Saccavini C
Radiol Med; 1995 Apr; 89(4):506-19. PubMed ID: 7597234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Assessment of radiographic screen-film systems: a comparison between the use of a microdensitometer and a drum film digitiser.
Verdun FR; Pachoud M; Bergmann D; Buhr E
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):208-13. PubMed ID: 15933110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Retrospective analysis of a detector fault for a full field digital mammography system.
Marshall NW
Phys Med Biol; 2006 Nov; 51(21):5655-73. PubMed ID: 17047276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Development and application of programs to measure modulation transfer function, noise power spectrum and detective quantum efficiency.
Padgett R; Kotre CJ
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 117(1-3):283-7. PubMed ID: 16461517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of technical and anatomical noise in digital thorax X-ray images.
Hoeschen C; Tischenko O; Buhr E; Illers H
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):75-80. PubMed ID: 15933084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Detective quantum efficiency measured as a function of energy for two full-field digital mammography systems.
Marshall NW
Phys Med Biol; 2009 May; 54(9):2845-61. PubMed ID: 19384004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Image quality parameters of film-screen systems].
Hoeschen D
Rontgenblatter; 1987 Jun; 40(6):193-9. PubMed ID: 3616429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effects of scintillator on the detective quantum efficiency (DQE) of a digital imaging system.
Farman TT; Vandre RH; Pajak JC; Miller SR; Lempicki A; Farman AG
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2006 Feb; 101(2):219-23. PubMed ID: 16448925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The Monte Carlo evaluation of noise and resolution properties of granular phosphor screens.
Liaparinos PF; Kandarakis IS
Phys Med Biol; 2009 Feb; 54(4):859-74. PubMed ID: 19141882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Impact of additive noise on system performance of a digital X-ray imaging system.
Zhang D; Rong J; Chen WR; Gao F; Xu K; Wu X; Liu H
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2007 Jan; 54(1):69-73. PubMed ID: 17260857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. DQE analysis on a dual detector phase x-ray imaging system.
Zhang D; Liu H; Wu X
Phys Med Biol; 2008 Sep; 53(18):5165-76. PubMed ID: 18723931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Physical characterization of a high-resolution CCD detector for mammography.
Elbakri IA; Tesic MM; Xiong Q
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Apr; 52(8):2171-83. PubMed ID: 17404462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Measurement of the modulation transfer function of digital X-ray detectors with an opaque edge-test device.
Illers H; Buhr E; Günther-Kohfahl S; Neitzel U
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):214-9. PubMed ID: 15933111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [The effect of technical parameters on diagnostic quality].
Brandt GA
Aktuelle Radiol; 1991 Jan; 1(1):16-22. PubMed ID: 2018801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Determination of the detective quantum efficiency of a digital x-ray detector: comparison of three evaluations using a common image data set.
Neitzel U; Günther-Kohfahl S; Borasi G; Samei E
Med Phys; 2004 Aug; 31(8):2205-11. PubMed ID: 15377085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
