85 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10179796)
1. Can computers improve the Health of the Nation?
Gillies A
Stud Health Technol Inform; 1997; 43 Pt B():889-93. PubMed ID: 10179796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Cervical smears taken by physicians' assistants are of lesser quality than smears taken by family physicians, but almost as good as the national average].
Voordijk-van der Ben MH; Buntinx F
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2000 Jan; 144(2):74-7. PubMed ID: 10674106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Can patients with osteoporosis, who should benefit from implementation of the national service framework for older people, be identified from general practice computer records? A pilot study that illustrates the variability of computerized medical records and problems with searching them.
de Lusignan S; Chan T; Wells S; Cooper A; Harvey M; Brew S; Wright M
Public Health; 2003 Nov; 117(6):438-45. PubMed ID: 14522160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A population-based study of primary care predictors of non-attendance for cervical screening.
Webb R; Richardson J; Pickles A
J Med Screen; 2004; 11(3):135-40. PubMed ID: 15333272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Progress in screening for cervical cancer.
Clarke EA
CMAJ; 1996 Oct; 155(8):1036-7. PubMed ID: 8873623
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. [Computerized monitoring for integrated cervical screening. Rationale, methods and indicators of participation].
Bucchi L; Pierri C; Caprara L; Cortecchia S; De Lillo M; Bondi A
Pathologica; 2003 Feb; 95(1):9-21. PubMed ID: 12735281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. State of the Art Symposium: prescreening and rescreening.
O'Leary TJ
Cancer; 2004 Dec; 102(6):331-3. PubMed ID: 15540232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Clinical impact of quality assurance in an organized cervical screening program.
Andrae B; Smith P
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 1999 May; 78(5):429-35. PubMed ID: 10326890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Cervical smears taken by physicians' assistants are of lesser quality than smears taken by family physicians, but almost as good as the national average].
van Rijswijk A
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2000 Feb; 144(8):399. PubMed ID: 10703599
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Quality control in Papanicolaou tests.
Wachtel M
Am J Clin Pathol; 2002 Nov; 118(5):804; author reply 805. PubMed ID: 12428803
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. [Experience in the organization of cytologic studies during preventive mass surveys of the female population of the Chuvash ASSR].
Kuz'min VI; Sergeeva GA; Vissarionova RI; Pokrovskaia EG; Konstantinova VV
Lab Delo; 1988; (1):63-4. PubMed ID: 2451082
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Primary care practice and facility quality orientation: influence on breast and cervical cancer screening rates.
Goldzweig CL; Parkerton PH; Washington DL; Lanto AB; Yano EM
Am J Manag Care; 2004 Apr; 10(4):265-72. PubMed ID: 15124503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The Pap smear: a victim of its own success?
Steigman CK; Vernick JP
MLO Med Lab Obs; 2002 Aug; 34(8):8-14; quiz 14-5. PubMed ID: 12228932
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Quality assessment in the age of machine-aided cervical cytology screening.
Renshaw AA
Cancer; 2004 Dec; 102(6):345-7. PubMed ID: 15540251
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Moves on cervical screens.
Jackman J
Health Serv J; 1986 Mar; 96(4992):418. PubMed ID: 10276759
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. [HPV test for quality control of gynecologic cytological tests].
Wilander E; Wikström I
Lakartidningen; 2008 Nov 26-Dec 9; 105(48-49):3560, 3564. PubMed ID: 19133586
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Breast and cervical cancer screening: clinicians' views on health plan guidelines and implementation efforts.
Zapka JG; Puleo E; Taplin S; Solberg LI; Mouchawar J; Somkin C; Geiger AM; Ulcickas Yood M
J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr; 2005; (35):46-54. PubMed ID: 16287885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Use of cancer screening services in Greece and associated social factors: results from the nation-wide Hellas Health I survey.
Dimitrakaki C; Boulamatsis D; Mariolis A; Kontodimopoulos N; Niakas D; Tountas Y
Eur J Cancer Prev; 2009 Jun; 18(3):248-57. PubMed ID: 19491613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Uptake of cervical cancer screening in The Netherlands is mainly influenced by women's beliefs about the screening and by the inviting organization.
Tacken MA; Braspenning JC; Hermens RP; Spreeuwenberg PM; van den Hoogen HJ; de Bakker DH; Groenewegen PP; Grol RP
Eur J Public Health; 2007 Apr; 17(2):178-85. PubMed ID: 16837520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Cervical cancer: an overview with suggested practice and policy goals.
Wells SF
Medsurg Nurs; 2008 Feb; 17(1):43-50; quiz 51. PubMed ID: 18429541
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
