279 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10179816)
1. What price success?
Tecnologica; 1996 Nov; ():1-6. PubMed ID: 10179816
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. In a bundling era, finding a fair price for ESRD services.
Sullivan JD
Nephrol News Issues; 2007 Mar; 21(4):37, 39-40. PubMed ID: 17393926
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Provider-patient relations and treatment choice in the era of fiscal incentives: the case of the end-stage renal disease program.
Bovbjerg RR; Held PJ; Diamond LH
Milbank Q; 1987; 65(2):177-202. PubMed ID: 3614141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. HCFA: failing to acknowledge the unique characteristics of the ESRD patient.
Kanter A; Nidetz M
Nephrol News Issues; 1990 Feb; 4(2):23-6, 31. PubMed ID: 2320135
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Re-engineering the ESRD Program amid Medicare reform.
Neumann ME
Nephrol News Issues; 2005 Jan; 19(2):40-1. PubMed ID: 15717573
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The direction of end-stage renal disease reimbursement in the United States.
Lockridge RS
Semin Dial; 2004; 17(2):125-30. PubMed ID: 15043614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. HCFA, Stark eye Medicare ESRD expenditures.
Koska MT
Hospitals; 1988 May; 62(10):84. PubMed ID: 3283025
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Proposed conditions for coverage directed toward dialysis facilities.
Smetanka S
Health Care Law Mon; 2005 Apr; ():3-11. PubMed ID: 15895752
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Caring for ESRD patients.
Andriote JM
Healthplan; 1998; 39(4):33-5. PubMed ID: 10351321
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The 2011 ESRD prospective payment system: welcome to the bundle.
Weiner DE
Am J Kidney Dis; 2011 Apr; 57(4):539-41. PubMed ID: 21333431
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Conditions for coverage fail to relieve administrative burden.
Wish D
Nephrol News Issues; 2005 Sep; 19(10):46-7, 51. PubMed ID: 16187648
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The 2011 ESRD prospective payment system: an uncontrolled experiment.
Winkelmayer WC; Chertow GM
Am J Kidney Dis; 2011 Apr; 57(4):542-6. PubMed ID: 21333428
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The 2011 ESRD prospective payment system: perspectives from Fresenius Medical Care, a large dialysis organization.
Lacson E; Hakim RM
Am J Kidney Dis; 2011 Apr; 57(4):547-9. PubMed ID: 21333423
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Adapting to changes in Medicare cost report requirements.
Rossi T
Nephrol News Issues; 2005 Sep; 19(10):36-9. PubMed ID: 16187645
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Impact of HCFA's revised billing instructions for kinetic modeling and recirculation tests.
Rosenthal AF; Mahlke KF
Nephrol News Issues; 1998 Feb; 12(2):12. PubMed ID: 9526364
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Dialysis outcomes in works. HCFA may set quality, practice guidelines for ESRD program.
Gardner J
Mod Healthc; 1997 Feb; 27(5):64-5. PubMed ID: 10164704
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The 2011 ESRD prospective payment system: perspectives from a for-profit small- to medium-sized dialysis organization.
Bhat P; Bhat JG
Am J Kidney Dis; 2011 Apr; 57(4):556-8. PubMed ID: 21316132
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The organization of medical care. Lessons from the Medicare end stage renal disease program.
Levinsky NG
N Engl J Med; 1993 Nov; 329(19):1395-9. PubMed ID: 8413437
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The 2011 ESRD prospective payment system: perspectives from DaVita, a for-profit large dialysis organization.
Nissenson AR; Mayne TJ; Krishnan M
Am J Kidney Dis; 2011 Apr; 57(4):550-2. PubMed ID: 21333425
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Bundling, and what is important for patients.
Eilers D; LeBeau K
Nephrol News Issues; 2009 Dec; 23(13):11. PubMed ID: 20050433
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
