These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

93 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10179823)

  • 1. The major demand for minimally invasive cardiac surgery.
    Tecnologica; 1997 Sep; ():1-6, 12. PubMed ID: 10179823
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparative economic analyses of minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass surgery.
    Gray DT; Veenstra DL
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2003 Mar; 125(3):618-24. PubMed ID: 12658204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass versus percutaneous coronary stenting for stenosis of the left anterior descending artery.
    Takagi H; Tanabashi T; Kawai N; Umemoto T
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2007 Aug; 32(2):400; author reply 400-1. PubMed ID: 17513117
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Minimally invasive coronary artery bypass graft surgery.
    Tecnologica MAP Suppl; 1998 May; ():14-6. PubMed ID: 10183369
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Minimally invasive heart surgery.
    SoRelle R
    Circulation; 1997 Oct; 96(8):2483-4. PubMed ID: 9355878
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. More surgeons do minimally invasive heart surgery.
    Alt SJ; Worrell B
    Health Care Strateg Manage; 2004 Apr; 22(4):1, 11-9. PubMed ID: 15141642
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Combination of minimally invasive coronary bypass and percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty in the treatment of double-vessel coronary disease: Two-year follow-up of a new hybrid procedure compared with "on-pump" double bypass grafting.
    de Cannière D; Jansens JL; Goldschmidt-Clermont P; Barvais L; Decroly P; Stoupel E
    Am Heart J; 2001 Oct; 142(4):563-70. PubMed ID: 11579343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Preliminary experience with minimally invasive coronary-artery bypass surgery combined with coronary angioplasty.
    Friedrich GJ; Bonatti J; Dapunt OE
    N Engl J Med; 1997 May; 336(20):1454-5. PubMed ID: 9148150
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Does off-pump or minimally invasive coronary artery bypass reduce mortality, morbidity, and resource utilization when compared with percutaneous coronary intervention? A meta-analysis of randomized trials.
    Bainbridge D; Cheng D; Martin J; Novick R;
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2007 Mar; 133(3):623-31. PubMed ID: 17320555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Angioplasty versus minimally invasive bypass surgery.
    MacGillivray TE; Vlahakes GJ
    N Engl J Med; 2002 Aug; 347(8):551-2. PubMed ID: 12192012
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A meta-analysis of randomized control trials comparing minimally invasive direct coronary bypass grafting versus percutaneous coronary intervention for stenosis of the proximal left anterior descending artery.
    Jaffery Z; Kowalski M; Weaver WD; Khanal S
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2007 Apr; 31(4):691-7. PubMed ID: 17300948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Minimally invasive bypass surgery.
    Wood WC
    N Engl J Med; 2002 Dec; 347(26):2165-8; author reply 2165-8. PubMed ID: 12501849
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cost-effectiveness of minimally invasive cardiac operations.
    Ferraris VA; Ferraris SP
    Heart Surg Forum; 2001; 4 Suppl 1():S30-4. PubMed ID: 11178305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass.
    Sim EK; Goh JJ; Cheng A; Tan HC; Lim YT
    Singapore Med J; 1999 Feb; 40(2):75-7. PubMed ID: 10414161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Factors affecting post minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass grafting incidence of myocardial infarction, percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty, coronary artery bypass grafting and mortality of cardiac origin.
    Kofidis T; Gerd Paeschke H; Lichtenberg A; Emmert M; Woitek F; Didilis V; Haverich A; Klima U
    Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2009 Jan; 8(1):49-53. PubMed ID: 18786942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass versus stenting.
    Takagi H; Kato T; Matsuno Y; Umemoto T
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2006 Apr; 29(4):632; author reply 633. PubMed ID: 16473513
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. How hospitals respond to cardiac care turmoil.
    Johnson DE
    Health Care Strateg Manage; 2004 Apr; 22(4):2-3. PubMed ID: 15141643
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Economic evaluation of different minimally invasive procedures for the treatment of coronary artery disease.
    Reichenspurner H; Boehm D; Detter C; Schiller W; Reichart B
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 1999 Nov; 16 Suppl 2():S76-9. PubMed ID: 10613562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Treatment of ischemic heart disease by minimally invasive coronary surgery with the "Octopus" system].
    Aĭtkozhin GK; Sigaev IIu; Berishvili II; Israilova VK
    Khirurgiia (Mosk); 2001; (10):17-20. PubMed ID: 11763812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Impact of multivessel coronary artery disease on outcome after isolated minimally invasive bypass grafting of the left anterior descending artery.
    Lichtenberg A; Klima U; Paeschke H; Pichlmaier M; Ringes-Lichtenberg S; Walles T; Goerler H; Haverich A
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2004 Aug; 78(2):487-91. PubMed ID: 15276503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.