These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

103 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10179836)

  • 21. U.S. Supreme Court rules that Americans With Disabilities Act covers asymptomatic HIV infection.
    Psychiatr Serv; 1998 Aug; 49(8):1108-9. PubMed ID: 9712225
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Bragdon vs Abbott: US Supreme Court set to re-examine HIV as a disability.
    Zuniga J
    J Int Assoc Physicians AIDS Care; 1998 May; 4(5):44, 46. PubMed ID: 11365189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Bragdon v. Abbott: the Americans with Disabilities Act and HIV infection.
    Greely HT
    N Engl J Med; 1999 Apr; 340(15):1213-4. PubMed ID: 10206851
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Title I of the Americans with disabilities act.
    Langer CS
    Occup Med; 1996; 11(1):5-16. PubMed ID: 8907047
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Bragdon v. Abbott: the Americans with Disabilities Act and HIV infection.
    Neiburger EJ
    N Engl J Med; 1999 Apr; 340(15):1213; author reply 1213-4. PubMed ID: 10206850
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Genetic discrimination: why Bragdon does not ensure protection.
    Rothstein LF
    J Health Care Law Policy; 2000; 3(2):330-51. PubMed ID: 15015483
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Management attorney discusses corporate response to HIV.
    AIDS Policy Law; 1998 Apr; 13(6):6-7. PubMed ID: 11365242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Statutory interpretation--federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act--Third Circuit holds that the FDA can obtain restitution on behalf of consumers--United States v. Lane Labs-USA Inc., 427 F.3d 219 (3d Cir. 2005).
    Harv Law Rev; 2006 Jun; 119(8):2636-43. PubMed ID: 16830436
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Dermatology and the Americans With Disabilities Act: a review of the case law.
    Curry ML; Curry JA; Cockerell CJ
    J Am Acad Dermatol; 2002 Dec; 47(6):926-9. PubMed ID: 12451380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. New EEOC guidance seen as helpful, but not decisive.
    AIDS Policy Law; 1997 Mar; 12(5):4-5. PubMed ID: 11364167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. AIDS law: Supreme Court declares that Americans with Disabilities Act protects people with HIV.
    Newsline People AIDS Coalit N Y; 1998; ():46. PubMed ID: 11367482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Safe, but not sound: limiting safe harbor immunity for health and disability insurers and self-insured employers under the Americans with Disabilities Act.
    Ziegler RS
    Mich Law Rev; 2002 Dec; 101(3):840-83. PubMed ID: 12725221
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Commentary: implementation of the Americans with Disabilities Act in the workplace.
    Ritchie AJ
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2002; 30(3):364-70. PubMed ID: 12380415
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Beyond 43 million: the "regarded as" prong of the ADA and HIV infection--a tautological approach.
    Esser BK
    Am Univ Law Rev; 1999 Dec; 49(2):471-503. PubMed ID: 11010729
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Americans With Disabilities Act raises ethical considerations for physicians.
    Strasser AL
    Occup Health Saf; 1991 Feb; 60(2):26. PubMed ID: 1826345
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Bragdon v. Abbott, asymptomatic genetic conditions, and antidiscrimination law: a conservative perspective.
    Clegg R
    J Health Care Law Policy; 2000; 3(2):409-29. PubMed ID: 15015487
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Americans with Disabilities Act: the crumbling of another wall.
    Gonzalez EG; Gordon DM
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 1990 Nov; 71(12):951. PubMed ID: 2146940
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Comparative evidence or common experience: when does "substantial limitation" require substantial proof under the Americans with Disabilities Act?
    Anderson CL
    Am Univ Law Rev; 2007 Dec; 57(2):409-78. PubMed ID: 18354868
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Supreme Court to rule on application of ADA.
    AIDS Alert; 1998 May; 13(5):53-4. PubMed ID: 11365411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Not disabled enough: the ADA's "major life activity" definition of disability.
    Friedland MT
    Stanford Law Rev; 1999 Nov; 52(1):171-203. PubMed ID: 10848093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.