151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10180221)
1. Acceptance testing.
Shearer DR
Radiol Manage; 1998; 20(3):22. PubMed ID: 10180221
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Objectively measuring and comparing performance levels of diagnostic imaging systems and practices.
Gur D
Acad Radiol; 2007 Jun; 14(6):641-2. PubMed ID: 17502252
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Checking out imaging needs before buying equipment.
Johnson KC; Thrall J
Mater Manag Health Care; 1994 Nov; 3(11):54, 56, 58. PubMed ID: 10138446
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Evidence-based radiology: step 1--ask.
Kelly AM
Semin Roentgenol; 2009 Jul; 44(3):140-6. PubMed ID: 19480896
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Electrosurgical units.
Health Devices; 1998 Mar; 27(3):93-111. PubMed ID: 9534067
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Electrical safety analyzers.
Health Devices; 1988 Oct; 17(10):283-309. PubMed ID: 3273912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Validation of medical image processing in image-guided therapy.
Jannin P; Fitzpatrick JM; Hawkes DJ; Pennec X; Shahidi R; Vannier MW
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2002 Dec; 21(12):1445-9. PubMed ID: 12588028
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Equipment safety and risk management.
Price P
Radiol Technol; 2004; 75(3):197-210; quiz 211-3. PubMed ID: 14983591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Positive control material introduced to ASTM Hemolysis Standard.
Stand News; 2000 Jan; 28(1):9-10. PubMed ID: 11829027
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Needlestick-prevention devices.
Health Devices; 1999 Oct; 28(10):381-408. PubMed ID: 10533680
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The safety of MRI. Considerations for site planning and clinical use.
Health Technol; 1988; 2(1):24-32. PubMed ID: 10286002
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Equipment standards for interventional cardiology.
Dowling A; Gallagher A; Walsh C; Malone J
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 117(1-3):79-86. PubMed ID: 16461508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Turf wars in radiology: the past, present, and future importance of training standards in imaging.
Rao VM; Levin DC
J Am Coll Radiol; 2005 Jul; 2(7):602-6. PubMed ID: 17411885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of the safety and durability of low-cost nonprogrammable electric powered wheelchairs.
Pearlman JL; Cooper RA; Karnawat J; Cooper R; Boninger ML
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2005 Dec; 86(12):2361-70. PubMed ID: 16344036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Changes in equipment acceptance testing.
Frey GD
J Am Coll Radiol; 2005 Jul; 2(7):639-41. PubMed ID: 17411893
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Gel dosimetry.
Morin RL; Ibbott GS
J Am Coll Radiol; 2006 Feb; 3(2):144-6. PubMed ID: 17412026
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Why advances in imaging technology are good for radiology, patients, and the bottom line.
Seshadri S
J Am Coll Radiol; 2005 Jan; 2(1):5-7. PubMed ID: 17411752
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Clinical trials of cost effectiveness in technology evaluation.
Valk PE
Q J Nucl Med; 2000 Jun; 44(2):197-203. PubMed ID: 10967629
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. MRI technology overview.
Sanders B; Faulkner W
Radiol Manage; 2001; 23(4):50-8. PubMed ID: 11499082
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Cholangiopancreatoscopy.
; Shah RJ; Adler DG; Conway JD; Diehl DL; Farraye FA; Kantsevoy SV; Kwon R; Mamula P; Rodriguez S; Wong Kee Song LM; Tierney WM
Gastrointest Endosc; 2008 Sep; 68(3):411-21. PubMed ID: 18538326
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
