130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10180874)
1. Costs and remuneration for cervical screening in general practice in the west of Scotland.
Myles S; Wyke S; Ibbotson T; Macintyre S; McEwen J; Kelly M
J Health Serv Res Policy; 1996 Oct; 1(4):217-23. PubMed ID: 10180874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Uptake of cervical screening in general practice: effect of practice organisation, structure, and deprivation.
Ibbotson T; Wyke S; McEwen J; Macintyre S; Kelly M
J Med Screen; 1996; 3(1):35-9. PubMed ID: 8861049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effect of practice and patient population characteristics on the uptake of childhood immunizations.
Lynch M
Br J Gen Pract; 1995 Apr; 45(393):205-8. PubMed ID: 7612323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. An evaluation of educational outreach to general practitioners as part of a statewide cervical screening program.
Stevens SA; Cockburn J; Hirst S; Jolley D
Am J Public Health; 1997 Jul; 87(7):1177-81. PubMed ID: 9240109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Substitution of doctors by nurses in primary care.
Laurant M; Reeves D; Hermens R; Braspenning J; Grol R; Sibbald B
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2005 Apr; (2):CD001271. PubMed ID: 15846614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Time costs associated with cervical cancer screening.
Shireman TI; Tsevat J; Goldie SJ
Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2001; 17(1):146-52. PubMed ID: 11329841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Cervical screening in Perth and Kinross since introduction of the new contract.
Reid GS; Robertson AJ; Bissett C; Smith J; Waugh N; Halkerston R
BMJ; 1991 Aug; 303(6800):447-50. PubMed ID: 1912838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Costs and benefits of cervical screening. I. The costs of the cervical screening programme.
Waugh N; Smith I; Robertson A; Reid GS; Halkerston R; Grant A
Cytopathology; 1996 Aug; 7(4):231-40. PubMed ID: 8853969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Costs and benefits of cervical screening IV: valuation by women of the cervical screening programme.
Wordsworth S; Ryan M; Waugh N
Cytopathology; 2001 Dec; 12(6):367-76. PubMed ID: 11843938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The inverse care law: clinical primary care encounters in deprived and affluent areas of Scotland.
Mercer SW; Watt GC
Ann Fam Med; 2007; 5(6):503-10. PubMed ID: 18025487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. An evaluation of cervical screening in general practice.
Lewis D; Mitchell H
Med J Aust; 1994 May; 160(10):628-32. PubMed ID: 8177109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The cost of cervical cancer screening provided by a women's health nurse.
Furber SE; Donaldson C
Aust J Public Health; 1992 Sep; 16(3):226-31. PubMed ID: 1482713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Quality measurement of care for people with type 2 diabetes in Tayside, Scotland: implications for the new UK general practice contract.
Guthrie B; Emslie-Smith A; Morris A; Fahey T; Sullivan F
Br J Gen Pract; 2003 Sep; 53(494):709-13. PubMed ID: 15103879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Cervical smears taken by physicians' assistants are of lesser quality than smears taken by family physicians, but almost as good as the national average].
Voordijk-van der Ben MH; Buntinx F
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2000 Jan; 144(2):74-7. PubMed ID: 10674106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effect of financial incentives on inequalities in the delivery of primary clinical care in England: analysis of clinical activity indicators for the quality and outcomes framework.
Doran T; Fullwood C; Kontopantelis E; Reeves D
Lancet; 2008 Aug; 372(9640):728-36. PubMed ID: 18701159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Primary and secondary care management of women with early breast cancer from affluent and deprived areas: retrospective review of hospital and general practice records.
Macleod U; Ross S; Twelves C; George WD; Gillis C; Watt GC
BMJ; 2000 May; 320(7247):1442-5. PubMed ID: 10827047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The effect of financial incentives on the quality of health care provided by primary care physicians.
Scott A; Sivey P; Ait Ouakrim D; Willenberg L; Naccarella L; Furler J; Young D
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2011 Sep; (9):CD008451. PubMed ID: 21901722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Screening for cervical cancer: attitudes and policies among Auckland general practitioners.
McMaster H; Arroll B
N Z Med J; 1992 Apr; 105(931):125-7. PubMed ID: 1560922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Provision of, and patient satisfaction with, primary care services in a relatively affluent area and a relatively deprived area of Glasgow.
Wyke S; Campbell G; Maciver S
Br J Gen Pract; 1992 Jul; 42(360):271-5. PubMed ID: 1419258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Pap smears in general practice: a secondary analysis of the Australian Morbidity and Treatment Survey 1990 to 1991.
Reid SE; Simpson JM; Britt HC
Aust N Z J Public Health; 1997 Jun; 21(3):257-64. PubMed ID: 9270150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
