These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. Key performance indicators to assess laboratory operations. Benchmarking with the best. Heatherley SS Clin Lab Manage Rev; 1997; 11(6):396-401. PubMed ID: 10176156 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Implementing preanalytical automation. The right volume, the right workflow. Dadoun R MLO Med Lab Obs; 2000 Jan; 32(1):32-6. PubMed ID: 11185289 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Streamline your automated hematology laboratory. Roundtable discussion. Cornbleet J; Fernandes BJ; Miers M MLO Med Lab Obs; 1997 Jan; 29(1):58-63. PubMed ID: 10164271 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Improving quality and resource utilization through the clinical technologist. Vatieri G; Gopaul D; Brown S; Hostetler P Can J Med Technol; 1995; 57(1):36-42. PubMed ID: 10141816 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. New benchmarks and design criteria for laboratory consolidations. Wilson LS Clin Leadersh Manag Rev; 2003; 17(2):90-8. PubMed ID: 12701564 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Laboratory results. Timeliness as a quality attribute and strategy. Howanitz JH; Howanitz PJ Am J Clin Pathol; 2001 Sep; 116(3):311-5. PubMed ID: 11554156 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A unique approach for reducing specimen labeling errors: combining marketing techniques with performance improvement. Simpson JB Clin Leadersh Manag Rev; 2001; 15(6):401-5. PubMed ID: 11822269 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Streamline your automated hematology laboratory. Roundtable discussion. Cornbleet J; Fernandes BJ; Miers M MLO Med Lab Obs; 1996 Dec; 28(12):50-3. PubMed ID: 10163265 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The impact of a pneumatic tube and computerized physician order management on laboratory turnaround time. Guss DA; Chan TC; Killeen JP Ann Emerg Med; 2008 Feb; 51(2):181-5. PubMed ID: 17467118 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Workflow improvement and impact of the new Beckman Coulter LH 1500 high throughput automated hematology workcell. La Porta AD; Bowden AS; Barr S Lab Hematol; 2004; 10(2):95-101. PubMed ID: 15224765 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The laboratory's role in outcome assessment. Bissell MG; Jones H MLO Med Lab Obs; 1998 Jan; 30(1):54, 56-8. PubMed ID: 10176488 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. An examination of the usefulness of repeat testing practices in a large hospital clinical chemistry laboratory. Deetz CO; Nolan DK; Scott MG Am J Clin Pathol; 2012 Jan; 137(1):20-5. PubMed ID: 22180474 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Creating the environment for process improvement. Welborn AL; Collins JB Clin Lab Manage Rev; 1995; 9(6):477-80, 482-9. PubMed ID: 10153279 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The laboratory workload measurement system revisited--the MIS group. Lalonde A Can J Med Technol; 1991; 53(2):123-4. PubMed ID: 10112872 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Strengthening the weak links in lab services. Lott JA MLO Med Lab Obs; 1991 May; 23(5):30-4. PubMed ID: 10111654 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. [The current situation of clinical laboratory automation and its exploration on a preferred scheme]. Yang D; Liu MF; Huang PJ Zhongguo Yi Liao Qi Xie Za Zhi; 2005 Mar; 29(2):120-3. PubMed ID: 16011118 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Blood sample volumes: emerging trends in clinical practice and laboratory medicine. McPherson RA Clin Leadersh Manag Rev; 2001; 15(1):3-10. PubMed ID: 11236192 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]