These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
22. Physician incentives. How one IPA gives its physicians feedback on performance measures. Boyd D; Whinery F Strateg Healthc Excell; 1998 Oct; 11(10):7-12. PubMed ID: 10187092 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Quality assessment tools: ACOG Voluntary Review of Quality of Care Program, Peer Review Reporting System. Lichtmacher A Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am; 2008 Mar; 35(1):147-62, x. PubMed ID: 18319133 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Peer review committee is learning laboratory. Cali M; Galler J N Y State Dent J; 1999 Oct; 65(8):24-5. PubMed ID: 10581930 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Hospitalist programs: are they good for your practice? Cook EC J Med Pract Manage; 2001; 16(6):285-8. PubMed ID: 11497305 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. ARKids immunization rates show improvement. Hopkins R; Haynes L J Ark Med Soc; 2009 Aug; 106(2):36-7. PubMed ID: 19715246 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Lab, pharmacy data spur docs to better compliance with diabetes DM efforts. Healthc Demand Dis Manag; 1998 Nov; 4(11):171-4. PubMed ID: 10338762 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Pay for performance: its influence on the use of IT in physician organizations. Williams TR; Raube K; Damberg CL; Mardon RE J Med Pract Manage; 2006; 21(5):301-6. PubMed ID: 16711099 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Peer review is the way to go. Leader DM J Mass Dent Soc; 2005; 53(4):30. PubMed ID: 15828603 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Implicit case review. Lee AG Ophthalmology; 2003 Jun; 110(6):1265-6; author reply 1266-7. PubMed ID: 12799263 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. [Assurance of process-quality in pulmonary practice by means of a peer-review system--a pilot project]. Fischer J; Köhler D; Magnussen H Pneumologie; 2006 Aug; 60(8):485-92. PubMed ID: 16933192 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Implicit case review. Lee AG Ophthalmology; 2003 Apr; 110(4):628-9; author reply 629-30. PubMed ID: 12689869 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Is rural radiation oncology practice quality as good as the big smoke? Results of the Australian radiotherapy single machine unit trial. Shakespeare TP; Turner M; Chapman A Australas Radiol; 2007 Aug; 51(4):381-5. PubMed ID: 17635479 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Quality of health care for women: a demonstration of the quality assessment tools system. McGlynn EA; Kerr EA; Adams J; Keesey J; Asch SM Med Care; 2003 May; 41(5):616-25. PubMed ID: 12719686 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Integrated medical groups and higher-quality medical care. Kumar PD Ann Intern Med; 2007 Jul; 147(2):147; author reply 147. PubMed ID: 17638725 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Managed care 1999. Could your ipa go under? Steer it to safety. Finger AL Med Econ; 1999 Apr; 76(7):205-6, 211-2, 214. PubMed ID: 10351792 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. The fox guarding the henhouse: how the Health Care Quality Improvement Act of 1986 and State peer review protection statutes have helped protect bad faith peer review in the medical community. van Geertruyden YH J Contemp Health Law Policy; 2001; 18(1):239-71. PubMed ID: 15255061 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Standards of care--another perspective. Poulton DR Angle Orthod; 2001 Apr; 71(2):iv. PubMed ID: 11302595 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. NY health plan, doctors partner on pay for performance system. Perform Improv Advis; 2005 Apr; 9(4):37-40. PubMed ID: 15945290 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]