These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10182002)

  • 1. Hospitals deliver reduced cesarean rates.
    Healthc Benchmarks; 1998 Aug; 5(8):124-7. PubMed ID: 10182002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Collaboration breeds innovation: forty-three Massachusetts hospitals collaborate to reduce cesarean section rates.
    Strateg Healthc Excell; 2000 Jul; 13(7):8-12. PubMed ID: 11183119
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Risk adjusting cesarean delivery rates: a comparison of hospital profiles based on medical record and birth certificate data.
    DiGiuseppe DL; Aron DC; Payne SM; Snow RJ; Dierker L; Rosenthal GE
    Health Serv Res; 2001 Oct; 36(5):959-77. PubMed ID: 11666112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. At Saddleback Memorial, care maps detail birth process interventions, cutting C-section rate and raising VBACs.
    Weber DO
    Strateg Healthc Excell; 1997 May; 10(5):7-9. PubMed ID: 10167182
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. OBSTAT: benchmarking for improvement in obstetrics.
    Healthc Benchmarks; 1999 Aug; 6(8):90-1. PubMed ID: 10557759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Hospitals, health plans and employers unite to reduce cesarean deliveries.
    Wynn P
    Manag Care; 1996 Dec; 5(12):57-8. PubMed ID: 10164024
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Reducing cesarean birth rates with data-driven quality improvement activities.
    Main EK
    Pediatrics; 1999 Jan; 103(1 Suppl E):374-83. PubMed ID: 9917479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Reflections on clinical improvement: the questionable role of clinical practice guidelines.
    Myers SA; Izui C
    Qual Lett Healthc Lead; 1993 Jun; 5(5):22-7; discussion 28-9. PubMed ID: 10126925
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of managed care enrollment on primary and repeat cesarean rates among U.S. Department of Defense health care beneficiaries in military and civilian hospitals worldwide, 1999-2002.
    Linton A; Peterson MR
    Birth; 2004 Dec; 31(4):254-64. PubMed ID: 15566337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Labor epidurals improve outcomes for babies of mothers at high risk for unscheduled cesarean section.
    Stuart KA; Krakauer H; Schone E; Lin M; Cheng E; Meyer GS
    J Perinatol; 2001; 21(3):178-85. PubMed ID: 11503105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Fetal monitors: hospitals continue use despite adverse reports.
    Stoltz MK
    Health Care Week; 1979 Jan; 2(28):1, 3. PubMed ID: 10323983
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Why pay extra for cesarean-section deliveries?
    Finkler MD; Wirtschafter DD
    Inquiry; 1993; 30(2):208-15. PubMed ID: 8314609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cesarean delivery in Native American women: are low rates explained by practices common to the Indian health service?
    Mahoney SF; Malcoe LH
    Birth; 2005 Sep; 32(3):170-8. PubMed ID: 16128970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Are the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality obstetric trauma indicators valid measures of hospital safety?
    Grobman WA; Feinglass J; Murthy S
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Sep; 195(3):868-74. PubMed ID: 16949428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Risk adjustment for inter-hospital comparisons of caesarean section rates in Taipei municipal hospitals.
    Hsu CC; Shieh GR; Wu CS; Shen HC; Tang CH
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2006 Aug; 127(2):190-7. PubMed ID: 16325330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. New admissions guidelines, policy changes result in fewer c-sections, lower costs.
    Health Care Cost Reengineering Rep; 1998 Nov; 3(11):165-71. PubMed ID: 10338915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Management of breech presentation--present and the future.
    Nakahara Y; Ishida S
    Jpn Hosp; 1992 Jul; 11():73-8. PubMed ID: 10120552
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Women's autonomy and scheduled cesarean sections in Brazil: a cautionary tale.
    Potter JE; Hopkins K; Faúndes A; Perpétuo I
    Birth; 2008 Mar; 35(1):33-40. PubMed ID: 18307486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Level of perinatal care of the maternity unit and rate of cesarean in low-risk nulliparas.
    Le Ray C; Carayol M; Zeitlin J; Bréart G; Goffinet F;
    Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Jun; 107(6):1269-77. PubMed ID: 16738151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Self-evaluation of obstetricians by delivery data to reduce cesarean section rate in Chai Nat Hospital.
    Kunthonkitidej K; Ngernset O
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2001 Nov; 84(11):1587-93. PubMed ID: 11853302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.