These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10182002)
41. C-sections give way to VBACs and better quality. Hosp Peer Rev; 1998 Oct; 23(10):184, 189. PubMed ID: 10185445 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
42. Cesarean section on request at 39 weeks: impact on shoulder dystocia, fetal trauma, neonatal encephalopathy, and intrauterine fetal demise. Hankins GD; Clark SM; Munn MB Semin Perinatol; 2006 Oct; 30(5):276-87. PubMed ID: 17011400 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. When one and one aren't two. Janatpour D QRC Advis; 1989 Mar; 5(5):1-4. PubMed ID: 10293938 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
44. Risk-adjusted cesarean section rates for the assessment of physician performance in Taiwan: a population-based study. Tang CH; Wang HI; Hsu CS; Su HW; Chen MJ; Lin HC BMC Public Health; 2006 Oct; 6():246. PubMed ID: 17029640 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. [Frequency and indicatrions for cesarean section in the Obstetrics Clinic in the University Hospital of Obstetrics and Gynecology "Maichin Dom" in Sofia]. Marinov B; Dukovski A; Milanova K; Manchev V; Garnizov T Akush Ginekol (Sofiia); 2005; 44 Suppl 3():17-19. PubMed ID: 16313079 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
46. A successful program to reduce cesarean section rates: friendly persuasion. Myers SA; Gleicher N QRB Qual Rev Bull; 1991 May; 17(5):162-6. PubMed ID: 2052351 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Integrating patient satisfaction into performance measurement to meet improvement challenges. Smith JE; Fisher DL; Endorf-Olson JJ Jt Comm J Qual Improv; 2000 May; 26(5):277-86. PubMed ID: 18350772 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Effect of labour induction on rates of stillbirth and cesarean section in post-term pregnancies. Sue-A-Quan AK; Hannah ME; Cohen MM; Foster GA; Liston RM CMAJ; 1999 Apr; 160(8):1145-9. PubMed ID: 10234344 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Managed care market share and cesarean section rates in the United States: is there a link? Hueston WJ; Sutton A Am J Manag Care; 2000 Nov; 6(11):1202-8. PubMed ID: 11185845 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Institutional factors in cesarean delivery rates: policy and research implications. Lin HC; Xirasagar S Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Jan; 103(1):128-36. PubMed ID: 14704256 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Infection survey nearly contaminates a reputation. Kaufman A Hosp Med Staff; 1977 Oct; 6(10):8-9. PubMed ID: 10305328 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
56. The association between hospital obstetrical volume and maternal postpartum complications. Kyser KL; Lu X; Santillan DA; Santillan MK; Hunter SK; Cahill AG; Cram P Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2012 Jul; 207(1):42.e1-17. PubMed ID: 22727347 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. 1988 U.S. cesarean-section rate: good news or bad? Myers SA; Gleicher N N Engl J Med; 1990 Jul; 323(3):200. PubMed ID: 2362615 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
58. Current topics in obstetrical risk management--Part II. Marta MR J Healthc Qual; 1994; 16(6):6-9; quiz 16, 48. PubMed ID: 10137425 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Cesarean section: Norwegian women do as obstetricians do--not as obstetricians say. Finsen V; Storeheier AH; Aasland OG Birth; 2008 Jun; 35(2):117-20. PubMed ID: 18507582 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]