361 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10182300)
21. Accreditation decision process supports continuous operational improvement.
Jt Comm Perspect; 2004 Jan; 24(1):17-20. PubMed ID: 14746097
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Upcoming changes to standards.
Jt Comm Perspect; 2006 Feb; 26(2):5, 9. PubMed ID: 16933546
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Implementation of laptops continues in 1998.
Jt Comm Perspect; 1997; 17(5):6. PubMed ID: 10182302
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. A quality information system 'wish list'.
Spath P
Hosp Peer Rev; 2005 Aug; 30(8):113-5. PubMed ID: 16094936
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. The ORYX program: beginning a new era in performance measurement.
Health Care Food Nutr Focus; 1997 Nov; 14(3):1, 3-4. PubMed ID: 10175263
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Accreditation requirements for ORYX: the next evolution in accreditation.
Zeglen M
J AHIMA; 1997 Jun; 68(6):20-2, 24-31. PubMed ID: 10167799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. ORYX data transmission requirement suspended for behavioral health care, home care, and long term care.
Jt Comm Perspect; 2002 Dec; 22(12):6-7, 15. PubMed ID: 12506451
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Sample sizes set for organization assessment of compliance.
Jt Comm Perspect; 2003 Oct; 23(10):9-10. PubMed ID: 14582376
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. A welcome delay. Small hospitals applaud JCAHO Oryx extension.
Moore JD
Mod Healthc; 1998 Jan; 28(1):14-5. PubMed ID: 10175894
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Quality managers: periodic performance review can be a powerful quality tool. Don't hesitate to put your processes under the microscope.
Hosp Peer Rev; 2004 Aug; 29(8):105-8. PubMed ID: 15338822
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. OASIS. The next 10 years.
Shaughnessy P; Crisler K; Schlenker R; Hittle D
Caring; 1998 Jun; 17(6):32-4, 36, 38 passim. PubMed ID: 10181304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Comparison of the full Periodic Performance Review (PPR), Option 1, Option 2, and Option 3.
Jt Comm Perspect; 2004 Sep; 24(9):8-9. PubMed ID: 15484654
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. What to know about JCAHO. Joint Commission survey process changing this year.
McLaughlin S
Health Facil Manage; 2006 Mar; 19(3):35-7. PubMed ID: 16594493
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. The ORYX initiative: goals and potential application to physician quality improvement efforts.
Hanold LS; Koss RG; Loeb JM
Tex Med; 2000 Oct; 96(10):84-7. PubMed ID: 11070741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. The new JCAHO accreditation report.
Jt Comm Perspect; 2004 Jan; 24(1):21, 26-7. PubMed ID: 14746098
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. ORYX data to play key role in new JCAHO survey process.
Hosp Peer Rev; 2003 Jan; 28(1):1-3. PubMed ID: 12561296
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. JCAHO offers two alternative ways to fulfill the periodic performance review.
Jt Comm Perspect; 2003 Oct; 23(10):1-5. PubMed ID: 14582373
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Joint Commission to require outcomes data from accredited organizations.
Natl Rep Subacute Care; 1997 Mar; 5(6):7-8. PubMed ID: 10165888
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Outcomes-based accreditation evolves slowly with JCAHO's Oryx initiative.
Campbell S
Health Care Strateg Manage; 1997 Apr; 15(4):12-3. PubMed ID: 10166108
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. The Joint Commission's ORYX initiative.
Popovich M
Caring; 1998 Jun; 17(6):44-5. PubMed ID: 10181305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
