BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

288 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10182310)

  • 1. Standardizing standards. Accrediting agencies form council to end confusion.
    Moore JD
    Mod Healthc; 1998 May; 28(21):22-3. PubMed ID: 10182310
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Accrediting organizations and quality improvement.
    Viswanathan HN; Salmon JW
    Am J Manag Care; 2000 Oct; 6(10):1117-30. PubMed ID: 11184667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Special report--ORYX: the next evolution in accreditation. Joint Commission introduces new requirements to integrate performance measurement into accreditation process.
    Jt Comm Perspect; 1997; 17(1):26-7, 29. PubMed ID: 10346346
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Joint Commission launches Standards Improvement Initiative.
    Jt Comm Perspect; 2006 Oct; 26(10):1. PubMed ID: 17139923
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. In their own words. Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations.
    Hermann RE
    Bull Am Coll Surg; 1999 Feb; 84(2):38-41, 58. PubMed ID: 10350987
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Upcoming changes to standards.
    Jt Comm Perspect; 2006 Feb; 26(2):5, 9. PubMed ID: 16933546
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Selected standards removed from implementation monitoring.
    Jt Comm Perspect; 1989; 9(9-10):8-10. PubMed ID: 10313791
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. New accreditation participation requirement regarding organizations' adherence to quality report approved for all programs.
    Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations
    Jt Comm Perspect; 2005 Mar; 25(3):4. PubMed ID: 16578958
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Exploring improvements in the accreditation process.
    Jt Comm Perspect; 2000; 20(5):14. PubMed ID: 11147541
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. What is a type I and how do you clear one?
    Jt Comm Perspect; 2001 Feb; 21(2):6-7. PubMed ID: 11246635
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Update on ORYX: the next evolution in accreditation.
    Jt Comm Perspect; 1997; 17(5):15-30. PubMed ID: 10182300
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Can JCAHO, NCQA, AMAP pull joint effort off?
    Healthc Benchmarks; 1998 Aug; 5(8):122-4. PubMed ID: 10182001
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. An assessment of accreditation with contingencies and the three-year award cycle.
    Ente BH
    QRB Qual Rev Bull; 1985 Mar; 11(3):93-6. PubMed ID: 3921895
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Redesigned ORYX Performance Measure Reports updated four times a year.
    Jt Comm Perspect; 2006 Mar; 26(3):9-12. PubMed ID: 16933569
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Top compliance issues for first half of 2003.
    Jt Comm Perspect; 2003 Nov; 23(11):1, 3-5. PubMed ID: 14635406
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Groups vie for lucrative managed care accreditation business.
    Johnsson J
    Hospitals; 1990 Apr; 64(7):35-6, 38. PubMed ID: 2312092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Accreditation standards in health care].
    Mainz J; Krog BR; Fog K; Bartels PD
    Ugeskr Laeger; 2002 Sep; 164(38):4408-11. PubMed ID: 12362732
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. How to stay prepared for a random unannounced survey.
    Jt Comm Perspect; 2000; 20(5):6-9. PubMed ID: 11147546
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The new JCAHO accreditation report.
    Jt Comm Perspect; 2004 Jan; 24(1):21, 26-7. PubMed ID: 14746098
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Getting better all the time. Systems redefine outcomes and the quest for health care quality.
    Hosp Outlook; 1998 Mar; 1(3):6-8. PubMed ID: 10186074
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.