221 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10182351)
21. Assessing JCAHO's core measures for surgery.
Hosp Peer Rev; 2000 Sep; 25(9):118, 123-4. PubMed ID: 11116486
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. New and improved. JCAHO's revamped report provides accreditation results in a new format.
Morrissey J
Mod Healthc; 2004 Jun; 34(23):8-9. PubMed ID: 15216610
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Call for core measures issued.
Jt Comm Perspect; 1998; 18(6):1, 3. PubMed ID: 10338955
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Top Type I recommendations for 2000. "Nutritional assessment" listed for hospitals, behavioral health, and home care.
Health Care Food Nutr Focus; 2001 Jul; 17(11):1, 3-5. PubMed ID: 11447894
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Living with the JCAHO's IM initiatives.
Glaser JP
Healthc Inf Manage; 1994; 8(2):3-4. PubMed ID: 10135915
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Data dispute continues. Hospital groups question JCAHO's use of information.
Conn J
Mod Healthc; 2005 Oct; 35(43):8-10. PubMed ID: 16276742
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. JCAHO to use ORYX data to detect sentinel events.
Hosp Peer Rev; 1999 Dec; 24(12):182-3. PubMed ID: 10724619
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. ORYX requirements simplified.
Jt Comm Perspect; 1999; 19(3):4. PubMed ID: 10538768
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Understanding JCAHO's latest PI (performance improvement) revisions.
Homa-Lowry J
Hosp Case Manag; 1998 Jul; 6(7):141-2, 147-8. PubMed ID: 10181274
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. JCAHO's O'Leary: 'We are an interpreter of public expectations'. Interview by Richard L. Clarke.
O'Leary DS
Healthc Financ Manage; 1994 Apr; 48(4):22, 24, 26 passim. PubMed ID: 10145978
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. JCAHO's ORYX initiative.
Catalano K
Nurs Spectr (Wash D C); 1997 Jun; 7(13):6. PubMed ID: 9431188
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. New year, 'new pathways'. Are you ready for the JCAHO's new survey process?
McLaughlin S
Health Facil Manage; 2004 Jan; 17(1):39-41. PubMed ID: 14750343
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Will you be ready for JCAHO's unannounced surveys in 2006?
OR Manager; 2005 Jul; 21(7):1, 12, 14 passim. PubMed ID: 16092613
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Inspecting the inspectors: could JCAHO's deemed status face a threat?
Hosp Peer Rev; 1997 Aug; 22(8):109-12. PubMed ID: 10169280
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. ORYX data collection valuable but difficult and labor-intensive, some say.
Hosp Peer Rev; 2001 Oct; 26(10):133-7. PubMed ID: 11586587
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Redesigned ORYX Performance Measure Reports updated four times a year.
Jt Comm Perspect; 2006 Mar; 26(3):9-12. PubMed ID: 16933569
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. JCAHO hits a wall with plan on indicators. Hospitals balk at costly and inefficient program to measure clinical outcomes.
Burda D
Mod Healthc; 1994 Mar; 24(11):30-3, 36, 38-40. PubMed ID: 10132311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Corrections to standards, rationales, and elements of performance.
Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations
Jt Comm Perspect; 2005 Mar; 25(3):8-9. PubMed ID: 16519335
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. ORYX: March 2 is breathing down your neck.
Hosp Peer Rev; 1998 Mar; 23(3):50-2. PubMed ID: 10177594
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Hospital industry balks at Oryx change.
Moore JD
Mod Healthc; 1999 Jan; 29(2):3. PubMed ID: 10344850
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
