These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
208 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10182585)
1. HCFA implementation of Stark II law examines motive in payment review. Caesar N Manag Care; 1998 Aug; 7(8):52-3. PubMed ID: 10182585 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Stark II wants contribution plan installed before payment period begins. Caesar N Manag Care; 1998 Oct; 7(10):52-3. PubMed ID: 10185866 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. HCFA needs to shine some light through Stark II's murkiness on 'gifts'. Caesar N Manag Care; 1998 Nov; 7(11):56-7. PubMed ID: 10187130 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Stark II: don't underestimate the feds' resolve to enforce it. Caesar N Manag Care; 1998 May; 7(5):55-7. PubMed ID: 10180142 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Proposed Stark II rules: clarification or more confusion? Shay A; Francesconi G J Health Hosp Law; 1998 Jun; 31(2):95-113. PubMed ID: 10186240 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Stark II: division of profits comes under closer scrutiny. Caesar N Manag Care; 1998 Jun; 7(6):56-7. PubMed ID: 10180805 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. The physician incentive plan rule: reevaluating physician compensation arrangements. Gauvreau E Manag Care Interface; 1997 Sep; 10(9):62-4. PubMed ID: 10175545 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. CMS issues final Phase III Regulations--significant impact on physician-hospital and physician-driven relationships. Becker S; Lundeen R; Heinze G Health Care Law Mon; 2007 Dec; 2007(12):2-19. PubMed ID: 18277700 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Stark reality. How Stark I and II will impact physician relationships. Avery PA; Wachler AB Mich Health Hosp; 1995; 31(5):34-6. PubMed ID: 10151703 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Phase I of the Stark II final rule. Wachler AB; Avery PA Mich Health Hosp; 2001; 37(4):52-3. PubMed ID: 11467128 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. HCFA issues. Stark II proposed rules. Portman RM; Lisa GC Bull Am Coll Surg; 1998 Jun; 83(6):20-23. PubMed ID: 10180259 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Proposed Stark II regulations unveiled. HCFA interpretation of self-referral rules recognize circumstances of dialysis providers. Riley JB; Pristave RJ Nephrol News Issues; 1998 Jun; 12(6):13-5. PubMed ID: 9697471 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. FAHS refers Stark II reactions to HCFA. Gogal L Hosp Outlook; 1998 May; 1(5):4. PubMed ID: 10185365 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The Stark truth about the Stark law: Part II. Gosfield AG Fam Pract Manag; 2004 Feb; 11(2):41-5. PubMed ID: 15011481 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. HCFA makes concession on 'Stark I' exemptions. Jaklevic MC Mod Healthc; 1995 Oct; 25(44):48. PubMed ID: 10152138 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Stark realities for hospitals. Reynolds M Healthc Financ Manage; 2004 Sep; 58(9):50-5. PubMed ID: 15460937 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The new Stark rules: what does Stark II Phase III mean for healthcare providers? Hofstra PS; Bilimoria NM J Med Pract Manage; 2008; 23(5):300-3. PubMed ID: 18472609 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Finally, HCFA proposes regulations interpreting stark II. Katayama AC WMJ; 1998 Mar; 97(3):67-73. PubMed ID: 9540454 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Is the Stark law necessary? An interview with a health law expert. Interview by Joan Naper. Gaynor JM Hosp Technol Ser; 1995 Oct; 14(12):3-5. PubMed ID: 10152541 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]