These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10182624)

  • 1. Roe vs. Wade at 25: the tough questions linger.
    Weiss B
    Med Econ; 1998 Aug; 75(15):138-40, 143-4, 147-8 passim. PubMed ID: 10182624
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Let's rethink Roe v. Wade--and overturn it.
    Mulder J
    Am J Bioeth; 2010 Dec; 10(12):65-6. PubMed ID: 21161853
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The legal status of abortion in the states if Roe v. Wade is overruled.
    Linton PB
    Issues Law Med; 2007; 23(1):3-43. PubMed ID: 17703698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Roe v. Wade and the lesson of the pre-Roe case law.
    Morgan RG
    Mich Law Rev; 1979 Aug; 77(7):1724-48. PubMed ID: 10245969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Late abortion and technological advances in fetal viability.
    Fam Plann Perspect; 1985; 17(4):160-4. PubMed ID: 3842806
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The women of Roe v. Wade.
    Glendon MA
    Hum Life Rev; 2003; 29(3):31-8. PubMed ID: 14964200
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Confusion of trimester and viability. Consequences for abortion laws in the United States and abroad.
    Beller FK; deProsse CA
    J Reprod Med; 1992 Jun; 37(6):537-40. PubMed ID: 1619608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Abortion: questions and answers.
    O'Connor JJ
    Hum Life Rev; 1990; 16(3):65-96. PubMed ID: 11656272
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Prenatal testing gone awry: the birth of a conflict of ethics and liability.
    Ackmann EA
    Indiana Health Law Rev; 2005; 2(1):199-224. PubMed ID: 17111503
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Will Webster redefine Roe v. Wade? The Supreme Court could use a Missouri case to begin limiting abortion rights.
    Chopko ME
    Health Prog; 1989 Jun; 70(5):58-64. PubMed ID: 10293331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The juridical status of the fetus: a proposal for legal protection of the unborn.
    King PA
    Mich Law Rev; 1979 Aug; 77(7):1647-87. PubMed ID: 10245967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Abortion: one Romania is enough.
    Lancet; 1995 Jan; 345(8943):137-8. PubMed ID: 7632209
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Abortion legislation after Webster v. Reproductive Health Services: model statutes and commentaries.
    Smolin DM
    Cumberland Law Rev; 1989-1990; 20(1):71-163. PubMed ID: 15999438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Toward a new analysis of the abortion debate.
    Bell KL
    Ariz Law Rev; 1991; 33(4):907-35. PubMed ID: 11656167
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Interruption of pregnancy before the period of fetal viability. The opinion of the national medical council about the abortion].
    Presse Med (1893); 1970 Nov; 78(48):2147-9. PubMed ID: 5482175
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. What happens if Roe is overruled? Extraterritorial regulation of abortion by the states.
    Bradford CS
    Ariz Law Rev; 1993; 35(1):87-171. PubMed ID: 12645556
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Statement concerning the discussion about the "initiative for descriminialisation" of abortion (author's transl)].
    Gloor PA; Lasagni F
    Schweiz Rundsch Med Prax; 1974 Dec; 63(48):1423-9. PubMed ID: 4438263
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Roe v. Wade, the next twenty-five years.
    Kissling F
    Conscience; 1998; 18(4):2-3. PubMed ID: 12178879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Abortion: medical perspectives and problems.
    John CC
    Pharos Alpha Omega Alpha Honor Med Soc; 1985; 48(4):31-4. PubMed ID: 4070358
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Court releases opinion concerning abortion.
    Barton HM
    Tex Med; 1992 Oct; 88(10):31-3. PubMed ID: 1462258
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.