These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

169 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10183285)

  • 1. The MHSIP mental health report card. A consumer-oriented approach to monitoring the quality of mental health plans. Mental Health Statistics Improvement Program.
    Teague GB; Ganju V; Hornik JA; Johnson JR; McKinney J
    Eval Rev; 1997 Jun; 21(3):330-41. PubMed ID: 10183285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. How consumers/survivors are evaluating the quality of psychiatric care.
    Campbell J
    Eval Rev; 1997 Jun; 21(3):357-63. PubMed ID: 10183288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Assessing quality in mental health care. The United Kingdom experience.
    Shaw I
    Eval Rev; 1997 Jun; 21(3):364-70. PubMed ID: 10183289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Toward a national consumer survey: evaluation of the CABHS and MHSIP instruments.
    Eisen SV; Shaul JA; Leff HS; Stringfellow V; Clarridge BR; Cleary PD
    J Behav Health Serv Res; 2001 Aug; 28(3):347-69. PubMed ID: 11497028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. National data standards for mental health management and performance indicators.
    Kamis-Gould E; Waizer J
    Psychiatr Hosp; 1992; 23(1):23-8. PubMed ID: 10116650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Managed behavioral health care premises, accountable systems of care, and AMBHA'S perms. American Managed Behavioral Healthcare Association.
    Ross EC
    Eval Rev; 1997 Jun; 21(3):318-21. PubMed ID: 10183283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Mental health quality and outcome measurement and improvement in Australia.
    Brown P; Pirkis J
    Curr Opin Psychiatry; 2009 Nov; 22(6):610-8. PubMed ID: 19730372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. NAMI'S managed care report card. National Alliance for the Mentally Ill.
    Hall LL; Flynn LM
    Eval Rev; 1997 Jun; 21(3):352-6. PubMed ID: 10183287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A consumer-oriented program review process for mental health care.
    Anagnos A; McConnell W; Chafetz L; Barto S
    New Dir Ment Health Serv; 1993; (58):77-84. PubMed ID: 8413117
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Determining the effectiveness of mental health services from a consumer perspective: part 2: barriers to recovery and principles for evaluation.
    Happell B
    Int J Ment Health Nurs; 2008 Apr; 17(2):123-30. PubMed ID: 18307601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Consumer participation in service evaluation and quality improvement: key ingredients for a system to deliver national indicators.
    Oakley K; Malins G; Riste L; Allan J
    Australas Psychiatry; 2011 Dec; 19(6):493-7. PubMed ID: 22077300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Involving people with severe mental illness in evaluation and performance improvement.
    Linhorst DM; Eckert A
    Eval Health Prof; 2002 Sep; 25(3):284-301. PubMed ID: 12229070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Quality and performance improvement for mental healthcare in Japan.
    Ito H
    Curr Opin Psychiatry; 2009 Nov; 22(6):619-22. PubMed ID: 19734785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Toward the behavioral health report card.
    Theis GA; Geraty R; Panzarino PJ; Bartlett J
    Med Interface; 1995 Mar; 8(3):80-2, 122. PubMed ID: 10141392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Psychometrics of the MHSIP Adult Consumer Survey.
    Jerrell JM
    J Behav Health Serv Res; 2006 Oct; 33(4):483-8. PubMed ID: 16791512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Consumer response to a report card comparing healthcare systems.
    Braun BL; Kind EA; Fowles JB; Suarez WG
    Am J Manag Care; 2002 Jun; 8(6):522-8. PubMed ID: 12068959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Mental health quality measurement in the Department of Defense. A developing system.
    Paris ML
    Eval Rev; 1997 Jun; 21(3):315-7. PubMed ID: 10183282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Developing a public mental health report card: the Hoosier Assurance Plan Provider Profile Report Card.
    DeLiberty RN
    Manag Care Q; 1998; 6(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 10177283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Measuring consumer participation in mental health services: are attitudes related to professional orientation?
    Kent H; Read J
    Int J Soc Psychiatry; 1998; 44(4):295-310. PubMed ID: 10459513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Building consumers in to service evaluation: development of the MH-CoPES Framework in New South Wales.
    Malins G; Oakley K; Doyle R
    Australas Psychiatry; 2011 Aug; 19(4):360-3. PubMed ID: 21879870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.