These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

81 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10183294)

  • 21. Project Towards No Drug Abuse: long-term substance use outcomes evaluation.
    Sun W; Skara S; Sun P; Dent CW; Sussman S
    Prev Med; 2006 Mar; 42(3):188-92. PubMed ID: 16413605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Educators' perceptions of the D.A.R.E. program.
    Donnermeyer JF; Wurschmidt TN
    J Drug Educ; 1997; 27(3):259-76. PubMed ID: 9366131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Prevention of illicit drug use through a school-based program: results of a longitudinal, cluster-randomized controlled trial.
    Guo JL; Lee TC; Liao JY; Huang CM
    J Adolesc Health; 2015 Mar; 56(3):314-22. PubMed ID: 25703320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Substance abuse counseling services in secondary schools: a national study of schools and students, 1999-2003.
    Terry-McElrath YM; Johnston LD; O'Malley PM; Yamaguchi R
    J Sch Health; 2005 Nov; 75(9):334-41. PubMed ID: 16255719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Truth or D.A.R.E. A new drug course.
    Lord M
    US News World Rep; 2001 Feb; 130(8):30. PubMed ID: 11234122
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Single vs. multiple drug prevention: is more always better?: a pilot study.
    Werch CE; Moore MM; Diclemente CC; Owen DM; Carlson JM; Jobli E
    Subst Use Misuse; 2005; 40(8):1085-101. PubMed ID: 16040370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Pearls and pitfalls in evaluating a Student Assistance Program: a five-year case study.
    Wilburn ST; Wilburn KT; Weaver DM; Bowles K
    J Drug Educ; 2007; 37(4):447-67. PubMed ID: 18351182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Is universal prevention against youths' substance misuse really universal? Gender-specific effects in the EU-Dap school-based prevention trial.
    Vigna-Taglianti F; Vadrucci S; Faggiano F; Burkhart G; Siliquini R; Galanti MR;
    J Epidemiol Community Health; 2009 Sep; 63(9):722-8. PubMed ID: 19395396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Do drug prevention effects persist into high school? How project ALERT did with ninth graders.
    Bell RM; Ellickson PL; Harrison ER
    Prev Med; 1993 Jul; 22(4):463-83. PubMed ID: 8415497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The impact of the "I'm Special" Program on student substance abuse and other related student problem behavior.
    Kim S; Mc Leod J; Palmgren CL
    J Drug Educ; 1989; 19(1):83-95. PubMed ID: 2723952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Implementation and process evaluation of a school-based drug abuse prevention program: Project Towards No Drug Abuse.
    Dent CW; Sussman S; Hennesy M; Galaif ER; Stacy AW; Moss M; Craig S
    J Drug Educ; 1998; 28(4):361-75. PubMed ID: 10097485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Preventing tobacco and drug use among Thai high school students through life skills training.
    Seal N
    Nurs Health Sci; 2006 Sep; 8(3):164-8. PubMed ID: 16911176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The impact of drug education and prevention programs. Disparity between impressionistic and empirical assessments.
    Gilham SA; Lucas WL; Sivewright D
    Eval Rev; 1997 Oct; 21(5):589-613. PubMed ID: 10183295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Say Yes First: follow up of a five-year rural drug prevention program.
    Zavela KJ; Battistich V; Gosselink CA; Dean BJ
    J Drug Educ; 2004; 34(1):73-88. PubMed ID: 15468749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Coverage of adolescent substance use prevention in state frameworks for health education: 10-year follow-up.
    Seitz CM; Wyrick DL; Orsini MM; Milroy JJ; Fearnow-Kenney M
    J Sch Health; 2013 Jan; 83(1):53-60. PubMed ID: 23253291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Substance abuse in sixth grade: results of a prevention program on adolescents' self-reported drug-related attitudes and behavior.
    Tatchell T; Waite P; Tatchell R; Kaderavek J; Strobel S; Jordan T
    Psychol Rep; 2004 Feb; 94(1):225-6. PubMed ID: 15077769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. A multivariate approach to a meta-analytic review of the effectiveness of the D.A.R.E. program.
    Pan W; Bai H
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2009 Jan; 6(1):267-77. PubMed ID: 19440283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Randomized controlled evaluation of the Too Good for Drugs prevention program: impact on adolescents at different risk levels for drug use.
    Hall BW; Bacon TP; Ferron JM
    J Drug Educ; 2013; 43(3):277-300. PubMed ID: 25445508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Project D.A.R.E. outcome effectiveness revisited.
    West SL; O'Neal KK
    Am J Public Health; 2004 Jun; 94(6):1027-9. PubMed ID: 15249310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A review of elementary school-based substance use prevention programs: identifying program attributes.
    Hopfer S; Davis D; Kam JA; Shin Y; Elek E; Hecht ML
    J Drug Educ; 2010; 40(1):11-36. PubMed ID: 21038761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.