These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

90 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10183311)

  • 1. The proper use of self-report questions in effective measurement of health outcomes.
    Schechter S; Herrmann D
    Eval Health Prof; 1997 Mar; 20(1):28-46. PubMed ID: 10183311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cognitive psychology and self-reports: models and methods.
    Jobe JB
    Qual Life Res; 2003 May; 12(3):219-27. PubMed ID: 12769134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Pretesting survey instruments: an overview of cognitive methods.
    Collins D
    Qual Life Res; 2003 May; 12(3):229-38. PubMed ID: 12769135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cognitive interviewing: verbal data in the design and pretesting of questionnaires.
    Drennan J
    J Adv Nurs; 2003 Apr; 42(1):57-63. PubMed ID: 12641812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Role of self-concept in answering survey questions on complementary and alternative medicine: challenges to and strategies for improving data quality.
    Willson S; Stussman B; Maitland A; Nahin RL
    J Altern Complement Med; 2009 Dec; 15(12):1319-25. PubMed ID: 19954343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The analysis and interpretation of cognitive interviews for instrument development.
    Knafl K; Deatrick J; Gallo A; Holcombe G; Bakitas M; Dixon J; Grey M
    Res Nurs Health; 2007 Apr; 30(2):224-34. PubMed ID: 17380524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Recommendations on evidence needed to support measurement equivalence between electronic and paper-based patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures: ISPOR ePRO Good Research Practices Task Force report.
    Coons SJ; Gwaltney CJ; Hays RD; Lundy JJ; Sloan JA; Revicki DA; Lenderking WR; Cella D; Basch E;
    Value Health; 2009 Jun; 12(4):419-29. PubMed ID: 19900250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A randomized trial of mailed questionnaires versus telephone interviews: response patterns in a survey.
    Feveile H; Olsen O; Hogh A
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2007 Jun; 7():27. PubMed ID: 17592653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. An overview of outcomes research and measurement.
    Maloney K; Chaiken BP
    J Healthc Qual; 1999; 21(6):4-9; quiz 9-10, 60. PubMed ID: 10662087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Questions about questions: cognitive survey of questionnaire development].
    Mittag O; Böhmer S; Deck R; Ekkernkamp M; Hüppe A; Telbis-Kankainen H; Raspe A; Raspe H
    Soz Praventivmed; 2003; 48(1):55-64. PubMed ID: 12756889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. An investigation into the content validity of the Antimicrobial Self-Assessment Toolkit for NHS Trusts (ASAT v15a) using cognitive interviews with antimicrobial pharmacists.
    Bailey C; Tully M; Cooke J
    J Clin Pharm Ther; 2015 Apr; 40(2):208-12. PubMed ID: 25678341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Update on the harmonisation of disability data collection in UK surveys (part 1).
    White C
    Health Stat Q; 2011; (51):3-30. PubMed ID: 21894156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cognitive impairment in multiple sclerosis does not affect reliability and validity of self-report health measures.
    Gold SM; Schulz H; Mönch A; Schulz KH; Heesen C
    Mult Scler; 2003 Aug; 9(4):404-10. PubMed ID: 12926847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Dental hygiene self-assessment: a key to quality care.
    DeVore L; Fried JL; Dailey J; Qori CG
    J Dent Hyg; 2000; 74(4):271-9. PubMed ID: 11314478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The devil is in the detail: reflections on the value and application of cognitive interviewing to strengthen quantitative surveys in global health.
    Scott K; Ummer O; LeFevre AE
    Health Policy Plan; 2021 Jun; 36(6):982-995. PubMed ID: 33978729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cognitive laboratory approach to designing questionnaires for surveys of the elderly.
    Jobe JB; Mingay DJ
    Public Health Rep; 1990; 105(5):518-24. PubMed ID: 2120731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cognitive adaptation and self-consistency in hearing-impaired older persons: testing Roy's adaptation model.
    Zhan L
    Nurs Sci Q; 2000 Apr; 13(2):158-65. PubMed ID: 11847701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cognitive aspects of survey methodology and quality of life assessment.
    McColl E; Meadows K; Barofsky I
    Qual Life Res; 2003 May; 12(3):217-8. PubMed ID: 12769133
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The test-retest reliability of the modified Patient Generated Index.
    Tully M; Cantrill J
    J Health Serv Res Policy; 2002 Apr; 7(2):81-9. PubMed ID: 11934372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Routine outcome measurement in mental health service consumers: who should provide support for the self-assessments?
    Gelkopf M; Pagorek-Eshel S; Trauer T; Roe D
    Eval Program Plann; 2015 Jun; 50():43-6. PubMed ID: 25748604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.