These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10183321)

  • 1. The effect of a monetary incentive in increasing the return rate of a survey to family physicians.
    Everett SA; Price JH; Bedell AW; Telljohann SK
    Eval Health Prof; 1997 Jun; 20(2):207-14. PubMed ID: 10183321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of different monetary incentives on the return rate of a national mail survey of physicians.
    VanGeest JB; Wynia MK; Cummins DS; Wilson IB
    Med Care; 2001 Feb; 39(2):197-201. PubMed ID: 11176557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A randomized trial of the impact of certified mail on response rate to a physician survey, and a cost-effectiveness analysis.
    Del Valle ML; Morgenstern H; Rogstad TL; Albright C; Vickrey BG
    Eval Health Prof; 1997 Dec; 20(4):389-406. PubMed ID: 10183331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects on response rates and costs of stamps vs business reply in a mail survey of physicians.
    Urban N; Anderson GL; Tseng A
    J Clin Epidemiol; 1993 May; 46(5):455-9. PubMed ID: 8501471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cost-effectiveness of a lottery for increasing physicians' responses to a mail survey.
    Baron G; De Wals P; Milord F
    Eval Health Prof; 2001 Mar; 24(1):47-52. PubMed ID: 11233584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of responses to a US 2 dollar bill versus a chance to win 250 US dollars in a mail survey of emergency physicians.
    Tamayo-Sarver JH; Baker DW
    Acad Emerg Med; 2004 Aug; 11(8):888-91. PubMed ID: 15289200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of a small monetary incentive and follow-up mailings on return rates of a survey to nurse practitioners.
    Oden L; Price JH
    Psychol Rep; 1999 Dec; 85(3 Pt 2):1154-6. PubMed ID: 10710970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Increasing return rates of a mail survey to exercise professionals using a modest monetary incentive.
    Hare S; Price JH; Flynn MG; King KA
    Percept Mot Skills; 1998 Feb; 86(1):217-8. PubMed ID: 9530736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Family practice physicians' firearm safety counseling beliefs and behaviors.
    Everett SA; Price JH; Bedell AW; Telljohann SK
    J Community Health; 1997 Oct; 22(5):313-24. PubMed ID: 9353680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Physician response rates to a mail survey by specialty and timing of incentive.
    Delnevo CD; Abatemarco DJ; Steinberg MB
    Am J Prev Med; 2004 Apr; 26(3):234-6. PubMed ID: 15026104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Conducting physician mail surveys on a limited budget. A randomized trial comparing $2 bill versus $5 bill incentives.
    Asch DA; Christakis NA; Ubel PA
    Med Care; 1998 Jan; 36(1):95-9. PubMed ID: 9431335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Randomized trial of use of a monetary incentive and a reminder card to increase the response rate to a mailed health survey.
    Perneger TV; Etter JF; Rougemont A
    Am J Epidemiol; 1993 Nov; 138(9):714-22. PubMed ID: 8237986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Increasing response rates in a survey of Medicaid enrollees: the effect of a prepaid monetary incentive and mixed modes (mail and telephone).
    Beebe TJ; Davern ME; McAlpine DD; Call KT; Rockwood TH
    Med Care; 2005 Apr; 43(4):411-4. PubMed ID: 15778644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The effect of a college pen incentive on survey response rate among recent college graduates.
    Stange JP; Zyzanski SJ
    Eval Rev; 2011 Feb; 35(1):93-9. PubMed ID: 21362640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effect of a monetary incentive for administrative assistants on the survey response rate: a randomized controlled trial.
    Agarwal A; Raad D; Kairouz V; Fudyma J; Curtis AB; Schünemann HJ; Akl EA
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2016 Aug; 16():94. PubMed ID: 27495186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Increasing response rates for mailed surveys of Medicaid clients and other low-income populations.
    Gibson PJ; Koepsell TD; Diehr P; Hale C
    Am J Epidemiol; 1999 Jun; 149(11):1057-62. PubMed ID: 10355382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Response rates and representativeness: a lottery incentive improves physician survey return rates.
    Robertson J; Walkom EJ; McGettigan P
    Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2005 Aug; 14(8):571-7. PubMed ID: 15937989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of e-mail, fax, and postal surveys of pediatricians.
    McMahon SR; Iwamoto M; Massoudi MS; Yusuf HR; Stevenson JM; David F; Chu SY; Pickering LK
    Pediatrics; 2003 Apr; 111(4 Pt 1):e299-303. PubMed ID: 12671142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effects of various methodologic strategies: survey response rates among Canadian physicians and physicians-in-training.
    Grava-Gubins I; Scott S
    Can Fam Physician; 2008 Oct; 54(10):1424-30. PubMed ID: 18854472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Do incentives, reminders or reduced burden improve healthcare professional response rates in postal questionnaires? two randomised controlled trials.
    Glidewell L; Thomas R; MacLennan G; Bonetti D; Johnston M; Eccles MP; Edlin R; Pitts NB; Clarkson J; Steen N; Grimshaw JM
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2012 Aug; 12():250. PubMed ID: 22891875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.