These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10183336)

  • 1. Cuing effect of "all of the above" on the reliability and validity of multiple-choice test items.
    Harasym PH; Leong EJ; Violato C; Brant R; Lorscheider FL
    Eval Health Prof; 1998 Mar; 21(1):120-33. PubMed ID: 10183336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Should essays and other "open-ended"-type questions retain a place in written summative assessment in clinical medicine?
    Hift RJ
    BMC Med Educ; 2014 Nov; 14():249. PubMed ID: 25431359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Efficiency analysis of two written short-answer student evaluation formats.
    Stratford PW
    Phys Ther; 1988 Oct; 68(10):1546-9. PubMed ID: 3174836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Multiple-choice testing in anatomy.
    Nnodim JO
    Med Educ; 1992 Jul; 26(4):301-9. PubMed ID: 1630332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Item development process and analysis of 50 case-based items for implementation on the Korean Nursing Licensing Examination.
    Park IS; Suh YO; Park HS; Kang SY; Kim KS; Kim GH; Choi YH; Kim HJ
    J Educ Eval Health Prof; 2017; 14():20. PubMed ID: 28900070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A comparison of the difficulty, reliability and validity of complex multiple choice, multiple response and multiple true-false items.
    Albanese MA; Kent TH; Whitney DR
    Annu Conf Res Med Educ; 1977; 16():105-110. PubMed ID: 606061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Format selection in machine-scored classroom achievement tests.
    Kolstad RK; Wagner MJ; Kolstad RA
    J Dent Educ; 1985 Dec; 49(12):799-803. PubMed ID: 3864827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Assessing context effects on test validity of the National Board Dental Examination Part I.
    Yang CL; Neumann LM; Kramer GA
    J Dent Educ; 2012 Apr; 76(4):395-406. PubMed ID: 22473551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Item analysis for the written test of Taiwanese board certification examination in anaesthesiology using the Rasch model.
    Chang KY; Tsou MY; Chan KH; Chang SH; Tai JJ; Chen HH
    Br J Anaesth; 2010 Jun; 104(6):717-22. PubMed ID: 20427368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Threats to validity in the use and interpretation of script concordance test scores.
    Lineberry M; Kreiter CD; Bordage G
    Med Educ; 2013 Dec; 47(12):1175-83. PubMed ID: 24206151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Pick-N multiple choice-exams: a comparison of scoring algorithms.
    Bauer D; Holzer M; Kopp V; Fischer MR
    Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2011 May; 16(2):211-21. PubMed ID: 21038082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Nonrestricted multiple-choice examination items.
    Kolstad R; Goaz P; Kolstad R
    J Dent Educ; 1982 Aug; 46(8):485-8. PubMed ID: 6954178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Statistical item analysis of the examination in anesthesiology for medical students using the Rasch model.
    Yang SC; Tsou MY; Chen ET; Chan KH; Chang KY
    J Chin Med Assoc; 2011 Mar; 74(3):125-9. PubMed ID: 21421207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Multiple true-false items: a comparison of scoring algorithms.
    Lahner FM; Lörwald AC; Bauer D; Nouns ZM; Krebs R; Guttormsen S; Fischer MR; Huwendiek S
    Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2018 Aug; 23(3):455-463. PubMed ID: 29189963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Design, format, validity and reliability of multiple choice questions for use in nursing research and education.
    Considine J; Botti M; Thomas S
    Collegian; 2005 Jan; 12(1):19-24. PubMed ID: 16619900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Assessment of spatial anatomical knowledge with a 'three-dimensional multiple choice test' (3D-MC).
    Schubert S; Schnabel KP; Winkelmann A
    Med Teach; 2009 Jan; 31(1):e13-7. PubMed ID: 19253152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. "None of the above" as a correct and incorrect alternative on a multiple-choice test: implications for the testing effect.
    Odegard TN; Koen JD
    Memory; 2007 Nov; 15(8):873-85. PubMed ID: 17965982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. F-type testlets and the effects of feedback and case-specificity.
    Baldwin P; Baldwin SG; Haist SA
    Acad Med; 2011 Oct; 86(10 Suppl):S55-8; quiz S58. PubMed ID: 21955770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A comparison of 3- and 4-option multiple-choice items for medical subspecialty in-training examinations.
    Chen D; Harman AE; Sun H; Ye T; Gaiser RR
    BMC Med Educ; 2023 Apr; 23(1):286. PubMed ID: 37106417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Identification-Based Multiple-Choice Assessments in Anatomy can be as Reliable and Challenging as Their Free-Response Equivalents.
    Douglas-Morris J; Ritchie H; Willis C; Reed D
    Anat Sci Educ; 2021 May; 14(3):287-295. PubMed ID: 33683830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.