These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. The evolution of utilization review liability. Reagan ME Health Care Law Newsl; 1992 Dec; 7(12):3-7. PubMed ID: 10123071 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Wilson v. Blue Cross: liability of payor to patient injured by early discharge. Cohen HH Med Staff Couns; 1991; 5(2):59-61. PubMed ID: 10183468 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Court decision echoes cautionary measures on payer liability risk. Corcoran ME Bus Health; 1988 Aug; 5(10):46-7. PubMed ID: 10288830 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. ERISA loophole permits utilization review firms to avoid liability for malpractice. Corcoran v. United Healthcare, Inc. Margolis RE Healthspan; 1992 Sep; 9(8):29-30. PubMed ID: 10183738 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Potential liability in utilization review: the risk grows. King ML Med Staff Couns; 1991; 5(2):27-31. PubMed ID: 10110106 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Mental health. Providers may be liable for releasing dangerous patients for lack of insurance. Bragg v. Valdez, 111 Cal. App. 4th 421, 3 Cal. Rptr.3d 804 (Ct. App. Cal 2nd Dist. 2003). West JC J Healthc Risk Manag; 2004; 24(1):35-6. PubMed ID: 16383266 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Courts let UR firms off the nook--and leave doctors on. Azebedo D Med Econ; 1993 Jan; 70(2):30-33, 37, 40 passim. PubMed ID: 10123617 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Refusing to pay for health care--Part III (of III): Avoiding third-party payer liability. Ross EJ Prog Cardiovasc Nurs; 1996; 11(3):41-5. PubMed ID: 8878300 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Perspectives. Liability lawsuits: casting a wider net. Kent C Faulkner Grays Med Health; 1992 May; 46(18):suppl 4 p.. PubMed ID: 10117460 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Whodunit? Causal responsibility of utilization review for physicians' decisions, patients' outcomes. Morreim EH Law Med Health Care; 1992; 20(1-2):40-56. PubMed ID: 1630141 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. I.V. withdrawal: the severance of medicine's or society's umbilical cord? Barber v. Superior Court of Los Angeles County, 137 Cal.App.3d 1006, 195 Cal.Rptr. 484 (1983). Chrisman JP Neb Law Rev; 1984; 63(4):941-72. PubMed ID: 11652480 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Criminal law--homicide--removal of intravenous feeding line from vegetative, comatose patient at family's request is not murder. Barber v. Superior Court, 147 Cal. App. 3d 1006, 195 Cal. Rptr. 484 (1983). Crook RR Cumberland Law Rev; 1984-1985; 15(1):225-37. PubMed ID: 11652439 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Wilson v. Blue Cross: a case synopsis. Roman S; Jamerson R QRC Advis; 1991 Sep; 7(11):1-3. PubMed ID: 10183515 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Court rules utilization review organization, its physician consultant, and insurer subject to suit. Hosp Law Newsl; 1991 Feb; 8(4):5-8. PubMed ID: 10183461 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Who'll be liable when a patient is injured? Thomas MC Med Econ; 1991 Apr; 68(8):56-8, 60-2. PubMed ID: 10110089 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Potential liability in utilization review. King MM Med Staff Couns; 1988; 2(1):7-11. PubMed ID: 10285831 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Reviewing the reviewers. Lazarus A Psychiatr Serv; 2001 Feb; 52(2):133. PubMed ID: 11157104 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Calif. jury clears Blues on UR call. Kenkel PJ Mod Healthc; 1992 Apr; 22(17):18. PubMed ID: 10117570 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]