184 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10183493)
1. Tube feeding and the permanently unconscious: the Supreme Court's decision in Cruzan.
Rouse F
Med Staff Couns; 1991; 5(1):39-44. PubMed ID: 10183493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Nancy Cruzan in China.
Annas GJ
Hastings Cent Rep; 1990; 20(5):39-41. PubMed ID: 2228588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The case of Ms. Nancy Cruzan and the care of the elderly.
Glover JJ
J Am Geriatr Soc; 1990 May; 38(5):588-93. PubMed ID: 2110203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The insane root takes reason prisoner.
Annas GJ
Hastings Cent Rep; 1989; 19(1):29-31. PubMed ID: 2497081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Cruzan v. Director, Missouri Dept. of Health.
Barton RS
Issues Law Med; 1991; 6(4):409-13. PubMed ID: 1903782
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. From the Office of the General Counsel. The right to die after Cruzan.
Orentlicher D
JAMA; 1990 Nov; 264(18):2444-6. PubMed ID: 2232004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The constitutional dimensions of the right to refuse medically assisted nutrition and hydration: an analysis of Cruzan.
Karbal W
J Health Hosp Law; 1990 Aug; 23(8):241-8, 256. PubMed ID: 10113286
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Cruzan: clear and convincing? How can they?
Busalacchi P
Hastings Cent Rep; 1990; 20(5):6-7. PubMed ID: 2228592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Essays in the aftermath of Cruzan.
White PD
J Med Philos; 1992 Dec; 17(6):563-71. PubMed ID: 1479306
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Cruzan: clear and convincing? Missouri stands alone.
Colby WH
Hastings Cent Rep; 1990; 20(5):5-6. PubMed ID: 2121666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Special report on patient care. Supreme Court upholds state court decision in Cruzan.
Kadzielski MA; Neumann PG
Health Care Law Newsl; 1990 Sep; 5(9):12-4. PubMed ID: 10113308
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The long dying of Nancy Cruzan.
Annas GJ
Law Med Health Care; 1991; 19(1-2):52-9. PubMed ID: 1910131
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Bioethicists' statement on the U.S. Supreme Court's Cruzan decision.
Annas GJ; Arnold B; Aroskar M; Battin P; Bartels D; Beauchamp T; Brock D; Buchanan A; Caplan A; Cohen C
N Engl J Med; 1990 Sep; 323(10):686-7. PubMed ID: 2385279
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Decisions to abate life-sustaining treatment for nonautonomous patients. Ethical standards and legal liability for physicians after Cruzan.
Weir RF; Gostin L
JAMA; 1990 Oct; 264(14):1846-53. PubMed ID: 2402044
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Cruzan v. Director, Missouri Department of Health. Too much ado.
Albert LA
J Leg Med; 1991 Sep; 12(3):331-58. PubMed ID: 1748837
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Surrogate decisions at risk. The Cruzan case.
Thomasma DC
J Am Geriatr Soc; 1990 May; 38(5):603-4. PubMed ID: 2110204
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. From the Office of the General Counsel. Cruzan v Director of Missouri Department of Health: an ethical and legal perspective.
Orentlicher D
JAMA; 1989 Nov; 262(20):2928-30. PubMed ID: 2810631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The right to die as a case study in third-order decisionmaking.
Schauer F
J Med Philos; 1992 Dec; 17(6):573-87. PubMed ID: 1479307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The case of Nancy Cruzan: the Supreme Court's decision.
Guarino KS; Antoine MP
Crit Care Nurse; 1991 Jan; 11(1):32, 34-6, 38-40. PubMed ID: 1899067
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. After Cruzan. The U. S. Supreme Court's decision settles the case but raises new questions.
Johnson SH
Health Prog; 1990 Oct; 71(8):38-41, 57. PubMed ID: 10107437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
