These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
42. Nancy Beth Cruzan: in no voice at all. Wolf SM Hastings Cent Rep; 1990; 20(1):38-41. PubMed ID: 2312269 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Living will statutes in light of Cruzan v. Director, Missouri Dept. of Health: ensuring that patient's wishes will prevail. McLean ED Emory Law J; 1991; 40(4):1305-41. PubMed ID: 16134267 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
44. Cruzan and the demands of due process. Haddad ME Issues Law Med; 1992; 8(2):205-28. PubMed ID: 1399496 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
45. The Cruzan case: who has the right to decide? Johnson SH Health Prog; 1989 Nov; 70(9):22-5. PubMed ID: 10313361 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
46. Practicing medicine, fiduciary trust privacy, and public moral interloping after Cruzan. Rie MA J Med Philos; 1992 Dec; 17(6):647-64. PubMed ID: 1479310 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Cruzan and its sequelae: the Supreme Court decides its first "right-to-die" case. Obade CC J Clin Ethics; 1990; 1(3):242-4. PubMed ID: 2132019 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
48. Position of the American Dietetic Association: legal and ethical issues in feeding permanently unconscious patients. J Am Diet Assoc; 1995 Feb; 95(2):231-4. PubMed ID: 7852693 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Interpreting the Cruzan case for Arkansas. Hackler C; Wilson AO J Ark Med Soc; 1990 Sep; 87(4):152-4. PubMed ID: 2146249 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
50. The calculus of consent. Scofield G Hastings Cent Rep; 1990; 20(1):44-7. PubMed ID: 2312271 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. The role of families as surrogate decisionmakers after Cruzan v. Director, Missouri Department of Health. Rushton CH; Hogue EE J Contemp Health Law Policy; 1991; 7():219-38. PubMed ID: 10111247 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
53. Cruzan and the constitutionalization of American life. Schneider CE J Med Philos; 1992 Dec; 17(6):589-604. PubMed ID: 1479308 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Between life and death lies dignity. Gasner R Mich Hosp; 1990 Jan; 26(1):6-11, 13-4. PubMed ID: 10113092 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
55. Cruzan v Missouri: will the real meaning please stand up? Barton HM Tex Med; 1990 Nov; 86(11):18-9. PubMed ID: 2126896 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
56. The constitution and the right to die. Peters PG Midwest Med Ethics; 1990; 6(4):13-6. PubMed ID: 16038075 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
57. Prisoners of technology--the case of Nancy Cruzan. Angell M N Engl J Med; 1990 Apr; 322(17):1226-8. PubMed ID: 2325714 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
58. Persistent vegetative state and the right to die: the United States and Britain. Jennett B; Dyer C BMJ; 1991 May; 302(6787):1256-8. PubMed ID: 2043853 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
59. Neurologic syndromes and prolonged survival: when can artificial nutrition and hydration be forgone? Cranford RE Law Med Health Care; 1991; 19(1-2):13-22. PubMed ID: 1910128 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
60. Beyond the Cruzan case: the U.S. Supreme Court and medical practice. Lo B; Steinbrook R Ann Intern Med; 1991 May; 114(10):895-901. PubMed ID: 2014952 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]