These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10183560)

  • 1. Federal antitrust jurisdiction in peer review cases: the Pinhas decision.
    Busey RC
    Hosp Law Newsl; 1991 Nov; 9(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 10183560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Federal laws govern the conduct of peer review.
    Devlin MM
    Am J Med Qual; 1992; 7(3):88-90. PubMed ID: 1493383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A case of wrongful use of quality management. Summit Health, Ltd., v. Pinhas.
    Trentalance AE
    Physician Exec; 1994 Jun; 20(6):28-9. PubMed ID: 10184123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Pinhas lessons.
    QRC Advis; 1992 Feb; 8(4):1, 7-8. PubMed ID: 10183629
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Supreme Court expands view of interstate commerce in peer review proceeding.
    Neugebauer JE
    Physician Exec; 1991; 17(4):30-1. PubMed ID: 10183511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Medical staff privileges and the antitrust laws: a view from the Federal Trade Commission.
    Horoschak MJ
    Med Staff Couns; 1992; 6(2):17-24. PubMed ID: 10116790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The antitrust laws and the medical peer review process.
    Hammack JM
    J Contemp Health Law Policy; 1993; 9():419-50. PubMed ID: 10126945
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Quality improvement act gets first antitrust test.
    Barnes CE
    Physician Exec; 1990; 16(4):36-8. PubMed ID: 10113358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Austin v. McNamara: antitrust immunity for peer review under the Health Care Quality Improvement Act.
    Herzog JP; Fisher DR
    Med Staff Couns; 1993; 7(2):55-61. PubMed ID: 10183844
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Court cases testing scope of federal law's peer review immunity.
    Burda D
    Mod Healthc; 1992 Aug; 22(34):80. PubMed ID: 10119842
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Legal aspects of peer review. Patrick v Burget in the U.S. Supreme Court: its impact on peer review.
    Couch JB
    Qual Assur Util Rev; 1988 May; 3(2):59-60. PubMed ID: 2980931
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Quality assurance implications of federal peer review laws. The Health Care Quality Improvement Act and the National Practitioner Data Bank.
    Snelson E
    Qual Assur Util Rev; 1992; 7(1):2-11. PubMed ID: 1603858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Medical staff privileges and the antitrust laws: does the Intracorporate Conspiracy Doctrine apply?
    Meghrigian AG
    Med Staff Couns; 1992; 6(2):9-16. PubMed ID: 10116795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Court grants HCQIA immunity in antitrust suit by physician. Smith v. Ricks.
    Hershey N
    Hosp Law Newsl; 1993 Jun; 10(8):3-5. PubMed ID: 10183876
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Is HCQIA (Health Care Quality Improvement Act of 1986) protecting peer review from antitrust claims?
    Cross LL
    Healthspan; 1993 Jun; 10(6):11-3. PubMed ID: 10127301
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Denials of staff privileges face increased antitrust scrutiny.
    Jacobsen RA; Wiggins RB
    Health Care Manage Rev; 1992; 17(4):7-15. PubMed ID: 1428862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Peer review and you.
    Dorian AL
    Qual Assur Util Rev; 1988 Aug; 3(3):84-7. PubMed ID: 2980936
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Antitrust issues for the nurse anesthetist: areas of concern.
    Recht PR; Garg RK
    Nurse Anesth; 1992 Jun; 3(2):57-66. PubMed ID: 1606205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Hospital and doctors granted antitrust immunity in important peer review lawsuit. Austin v. McNamara.
    Kadzielski MA
    Health Care Law Newsl; 1993 Feb; 8(2):8-12. PubMed ID: 10183829
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Antitrust immunity granted in a far-reaching peer review case. Austin v. McNamara.
    Kadzielski MA
    Health Prog; 1993; 74(1):19, 29. PubMed ID: 10183820
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.