147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10183624)
1. Inspector General wins round two of Hanlester Case.
Dechene JC
Med Staff Couns; 1992; 6(2):1-8. PubMed ID: 10183624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Hanlester Laboratories decision: how is it affected by new sanctions and penalties regulations?
Hooper P; Tully WB; Goldberg LJ
Healthspan; 1992 Mar; 9(3):13-20. PubMed ID: 10183644
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Inspector General v. Hanlester Network: a new fraud and abuse standard?
Gummerman D
Med Staff Couns; 1991; 5(4):59-61. PubMed ID: 10183523
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Departmental appeals board issues final decision in Hanlester Network case.
Lindeke JM
Health Care Law Newsl; 1992 Nov; 7(11):11-4. PubMed ID: 10183756
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Special report on reimbursement. Is there life after the fraud and abuse safe harbors?
Blacker RA
Health Care Law Newsl; 1989 May; 4(5):8-12. PubMed ID: 10303444
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. "Hanlester Laboratories": HHS joint venture standards remain unclear.
Tully WB
Healthspan; 1991 Nov; 8(10):8-11. PubMed ID: 10114943
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. The problem of physician self-referral under the Medicare and Medicaid antikickback statute. The Hanlester Network case and the safe harbor regulation.
Crane TS
JAMA; 1992 Jul; 268(1):85-91. PubMed ID: 1608118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Medicare and Medicaid fraud and abuse regulation. Hanlester case provides hope for joint ventures.
Melloh D
Minn Med; 1991 May; 74(5):31-3. PubMed ID: 1861661
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Narrow harbors. Few joint ventures will find haven in the investment-interest safe harbor.
Lepper GJ; Swoboda J
Health Prog; 1991 Dec; 72(10):44-7. PubMed ID: 10115212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Safe harbors and physician investment interests.
Bossen R; Luetkemeyer T
Adm Radiol; 1991 Oct; 10(10):33-5, 37-8. PubMed ID: 10114784
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. "Fraud alert": joint venture arrangements.
Vipperman RM
Med Staff Couns; 1989; 3(4):57-61. PubMed ID: 10303857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Hanlester Laboratories decision gives dangerously broad interpretation of federal anti-kickback statute.
Tully WB; Wirth PH
Healthspan; 1992 Jun; 9(6):11-4. PubMed ID: 10183678
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. HHS IG's final "safe harbor" recommendations: more exemptions--and more strings.
Part B News; 1989 Nov; 3(15):suppl 1-4. PubMed ID: 10304045
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Special report. HHS IG's final "safe harbor" recommendations: more exemptions--and more strings.
Health Policy Week; 1989 Nov; 18(42):suppl 1-6. PubMed ID: 10304221
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Sailing without safe harbors: physician recruitment and the law of fraud and abuse.
Kaser BA
Healthspan; 1992 Mar; 9(3):9-12. PubMed ID: 10118009
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Special report on reimbursement. What to do if the Inspector General subpoenas your records.
Conn LC; Lee AD
Health Care Law Newsl; 1990 Apr; 5(4):12-4. PubMed ID: 10106514
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Joint ventures: still unclear waters.
Weissburg C; Conn LC
Health Syst Rev; 1992; 25(2):40-2. PubMed ID: 10116880
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Joint ventures become even riskier.
Azevedo D
Med Econ; 1993 Jul; 70(14):36-8, 41, 44-5. PubMed ID: 10127361
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Ninth Circuit Hanlester decision adds another twist to anti-kickback statute.
Roeder KH
Ga Hosp Today; 1995 May; 39(5):3. PubMed ID: 10184462
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. The impact of fraud and abuse regulations.
Mackelvie CF; Handler MS; Sanborn AB
Healthc Financ Manage; 1992 Oct; 46(10):26-30, 32-3. PubMed ID: 10145687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
