These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10183733)

  • 1. Supreme Court preserves right to abortion, but allows restrictions. Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey.
    Swisher KN; Berriman GS
    J Healthc Risk Manag; 1992; 12(4):50-2. PubMed ID: 10183733
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Planned Parenthood v Casey.
    Lasky HP
    JAMA; 1993 Dec; 270(21):2559; author reply 2559-60. PubMed ID: 8230640
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. State abortion statutes on the eve of the Supreme Court's decision in Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey.
    Terwilliger LM
    J Health Hosp Law; 1992 Jun; 25(6):161-74. PubMed ID: 10123589
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The principles and principals of abortion compromise.
    Wing KR
    J Health Polit Policy Law; 1993; 18(4):967-82. PubMed ID: 8120354
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comment: United States Supreme Court upholds right to abortion subject to increased state regulation. Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey.
    Cerny RA
    J Health Hosp Law; 1992 Jul; 25(7):212-5. PubMed ID: 10183821
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The Supreme Court, liberty, and abortion.
    Annas GJ
    N Engl J Med; 1992 Aug; 327(9):651-4. PubMed ID: 1640971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey.
    U.S. District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
    Fed Suppl; 1993 May; 822():227-39. PubMed ID: 11648410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey.
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Wests Supreme Court Report; 1992 Jun; 112():2791-885. PubMed ID: 12041291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The economic impact of state restrictions on abortion: parental consent and notification laws and Medicaid funding restrictions.
    Haas-Wilson D
    J Policy Anal Manage; 1993; 12(3):498-511. PubMed ID: 10127357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey.
    U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
    Fed Report; 1991 Oct; 947():682-727. PubMed ID: 11648596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Utah Women's Clinic, Inc. v. Leavitt.
    U.S. District Court, D. Utah, C.D.
    Fed Suppl; 1994 Feb; 844():1482-95. PubMed ID: 11648412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey: the reaffirmation of Roe or the beginning of the end?
    Henry KS
    Univ Louisv J Fam Law; 1993-1994 Winter; 32(1):93-113. PubMed ID: 11660011
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Planned Parenthood v. Casey: the current state of abortion law.
    Berlin SI
    Second Opin; 1993 Jan; 18(3):104-9. PubMed ID: 11645221
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Court reaffirms Roe but upholds restrictions.
    Fam Plann Perspect; 1992; 24(4):174-7, 185. PubMed ID: 1526274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennnsylvania v. Casey.
    U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
    Fed Report; 1992 Oct; 978():74-8. PubMed ID: 11648602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Consti-tortion: tort law as an end-run around abortion rights after Planned Parenthood v. Casey.
    Stone AJ
    Am Univ J Gend Soc Policy Law; 2000; 8(2):471-515. PubMed ID: 16594110
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. High Court, 5-4, affirms right to abortion but allows most of Pennsylvania's limits.
    Greenhouse L
    N Y Times Web; 1992 Jun; ():A1, A15-17. PubMed ID: 11647923
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey.
    U.S. District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
    Fed Suppl; 1990 Aug; 744():1323-98. PubMed ID: 11648591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. "Partial-birth abortion" and the Supreme Court.
    Annas GJ
    N Engl J Med; 2001 Jan; 344(2):152-6. PubMed ID: 11150367
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Court gets stark arguments on abortion.
    Greenhouse L
    N Y Times Web; 1992 Apr; ():A1, B10-11. PubMed ID: 11646254
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.