These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10183738)

  • 1. ERISA loophole permits utilization review firms to avoid liability for malpractice. Corcoran v. United Healthcare, Inc.
    Margolis RE
    Healthspan; 1992 Sep; 9(8):29-30. PubMed ID: 10183738
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Corcoran v. United Healthcare, Inc.: liability of utilization review companies in light of ERISA.
    Mellette PM; Kurtz JE
    J Health Hosp Law; 1993 May; 26(5):129-32, 160. PubMed ID: 10183895
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. ERISA preemption: will the elimination of the ERISA preemption clause help or harm America's ability to deal with its pending health care crisis?
    Taylor DH
    J Law Health; 1999-2000; 14(1):133-78. PubMed ID: 11187365
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The evolution of utilization review liability.
    Reagan ME
    Health Care Law Newsl; 1992 Dec; 7(12):3-7. PubMed ID: 10123071
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Refusing to pay for health care--Part III (of III): Avoiding third-party payer liability.
    Ross EJ
    Prog Cardiovasc Nurs; 1996; 11(3):41-5. PubMed ID: 8878300
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. On ERISA protection, employers beware.
    Severson NJ
    Bus Health; 1993 Jun; 11(7):74, 76. PubMed ID: 10126720
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Liability for managed care decisions: the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) and the uneven playing field.
    Mariner WK
    Am J Public Health; 1996 Jun; 86(6):863-9. PubMed ID: 8659664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Liability implications of utilization review as a cost containment mechanism.
    Schessler CE
    J Contemp Health Law Policy; 1992; 8():379-406. PubMed ID: 10118988
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Courts let UR firms off the nook--and leave doctors on.
    Azebedo D
    Med Econ; 1993 Jan; 70(2):30-33, 37, 40 passim. PubMed ID: 10123617
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Managed health care: great cost savings with minimal legal risks.
    Postol LP
    Empl Benefits J; 1992 Sep; 17(3):32-4, 42. PubMed ID: 10121264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Managed care liability and the capitated provider.
    Reagan ME
    Health Care Law Newsl; 1995 Oct; 10(10):3-4. PubMed ID: 10151241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. ERISA plan administrator's denial of coverage for treatment provided to unborn child not within pre-existing illness exclusion: Foster v. State Farm.
    Crocker BD
    J Health Hosp Law; 1995; 28(1):31-4. PubMed ID: 10184274
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Employers balk at provider-backed efforts to limit reach of utilization-review firms.
    Kenkel PJ
    Mod Healthc; 1991 Oct; 21(41):30. PubMed ID: 10114204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Managed care, liability, and ERISA.
    Stone AA
    Psychiatr Clin North Am; 1999 Mar; 22(1):17-29. PubMed ID: 10083942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. How medical reviewers can avoid bad faith claims and ERISA violations.
    Martin CA
    J Insur Med; 1993; 25(4):410-4. PubMed ID: 10150785
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Who'll be liable when a patient is injured?
    Thomas MC
    Med Econ; 1991 Apr; 68(8):56-8, 60-2. PubMed ID: 10110089
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Are insurers making treatment decisions?
    Sfikas PM
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1998 Jul; 129(7):1036-9. PubMed ID: 9685771
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The liability of medical directors for utilization review decisions.
    Trueman DL
    J Health Law; 2002; 35(1):105-43. PubMed ID: 11974520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. ERISA preemption. Colleton Regional Hospital v. MRS Medical Review Systems Inc.
    Benefits Q; 1997; 13(1):70-1. PubMed ID: 10184694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The critical role of ERISA in state health reform.
    Chirba-Martin MA; Brennan TA
    Health Aff (Millwood); 1994 Spring (II); 13(2):142-56. PubMed ID: 8056368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.