128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10183895)
1. Corcoran v. United Healthcare, Inc.: liability of utilization review companies in light of ERISA.
Mellette PM; Kurtz JE
J Health Hosp Law; 1993 May; 26(5):129-32, 160. PubMed ID: 10183895
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. ERISA loophole permits utilization review firms to avoid liability for malpractice. Corcoran v. United Healthcare, Inc.
Margolis RE
Healthspan; 1992 Sep; 9(8):29-30. PubMed ID: 10183738
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. How medical reviewers can avoid bad faith claims and ERISA violations.
Martin CA
J Insur Med; 1993; 25(4):410-4. PubMed ID: 10150785
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Managed care liability and the capitated provider.
Reagan ME
Health Care Law Newsl; 1995 Oct; 10(10):3-4. PubMed ID: 10151241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Patient could not sue insurer for denying coverage.
Mamorsky JD
J Health Care Benefits; 1994; 3(5):60-4. PubMed ID: 10133666
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. A guide to ERISA-covered plans.
Mamorsky JD
J Health Care Benefits; 1993; 3(1):52-6. PubMed ID: 10130351
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. When plan summaries are inadequate.
Goldstein P
Bus Health; 1994 Jul; 12(7):50-1. PubMed ID: 10135574
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Health plan ordered to pay high penalty.
Lewis A; Delaney A; Erban J
J Health Care Benefits; 1994; 3(5):32-6. PubMed ID: 10133660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Liability for managed care decisions: the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) and the uneven playing field.
Mariner WK
Am J Public Health; 1996 Jun; 86(6):863-9. PubMed ID: 8659664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. ERISA plan administrator's denial of coverage for treatment provided to unborn child not within pre-existing illness exclusion: Foster v. State Farm.
Crocker BD
J Health Hosp Law; 1995; 28(1):31-4. PubMed ID: 10184274
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. ERISA estoppel: say what you mean and mean what you say.
Walsh JT
Empl Benefits J; 1994 Dec; 19(4):6-7, 12. PubMed ID: 10141066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. ERISA: protection for the HMO industry against bad faith claims.
Bacon DL; Miles DE
GHAA J; 1988; 9(2):14-9. PubMed ID: 10291737
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Where the Supreme Court feared to tread: closing the loopholes in ERISA section 510.
Klym TC
J Health Hosp Law; 1993 Nov; 26(11):321-7, 352. PubMed ID: 10171939
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. A magic bullet for managed care.
Lewis A
Bus Health; 1995 Apr; 13(4):100. PubMed ID: 10152735
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Federal court assumes ERISA claims jurisdiction.
Reif RD
Physician Exec; 1991; 17(3):38-9. PubMed ID: 10111672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. ERISA preemption: will the elimination of the ERISA preemption clause help or harm America's ability to deal with its pending health care crisis?
Taylor DH
J Law Health; 1999-2000; 14(1):133-78. PubMed ID: 11187365
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Postretirement healthcare benefit rules require careful study.
Brotman BA
Healthc Financ Manage; 1994 Mar; 48(3):66-8, 70. PubMed ID: 10145971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Review of Disability Claim. Hoffman v. Screen Actors Guild--Producers Pension Plan,_Fed. Appx._, 2014 WL 1664400 (9th Cir. 2014).
Benefits Q; 2015; 31(1):71. PubMed ID: 26540949
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Benefits Claim Statute of Limitations. Riley v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company, 744 F.3d 241, 57 EBC 2153 (1st Cir. 2014).
Benefits Q; 2015; 31(1):68. PubMed ID: 26540946
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Long-Term Disability Plan Administration. Melech v. Life Insurance Company of North America, 739 F.3d 663, 57 EBC 1800 (11th Cir. 2014).
Benefits Q; 2015; 31(1):65-6. PubMed ID: 26540945
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
