These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
22. ERISA-based defense can shield HMOs from costly suits. Bacon DL; Miles DE Contract Healthc; 1988 Jun; ():26-7. PubMed ID: 10290606 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Statute of Limitations in LTD Termination Appeal. Gordon v. Deloitte & Touche, LLP Group Long-Term Disability Plan, 2014 WL 1394962 (9th Cir. 2014). Benefits Q; 2015; 31(1):70-1. PubMed ID: 26540948 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Discretion to Deny Benefits. Prezioso v. The Prudential Insurance Company of America, 2014 WL 1356862 (8th Cir. 2014). Benefits Q; 2015; 31(1):69-70. PubMed ID: 26540947 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Federal action necessary to save retiree plans. Margolis RE Healthspan; 1993 Apr; 10(4):22-4. PubMed ID: 10128022 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Debate turns to ERISA reform for states. Gardner J Mod Healthc; 1994 Oct; 24(41):33. PubMed ID: 10138628 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. ERISA preemption and its effects on capping the health benefits of individuals with AIDS: a demonstration of why the United States health and insurance systems require substantial reform. Palmer L Spec Law Dig Health Care Law; 1994 Jul; (185):9-49. PubMed ID: 10171923 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Failure to exhaust administrative remedies. Ravencraft v. UNUM Life Insurance Company of America. Benefits Q; 2001; 17(2):70-1. PubMed ID: 11372477 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. The limits of state action? The myths and realities of ERISA. Employee Retirement Income Security Act. Crittenden R J Am Board Fam Pract; 1996; 9(3):208-11. PubMed ID: 8743234 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Emerging theories of liability for utilization review under ERISA health plans. Pomfret SD Tort Insur Law J; 1998; 34(1):131-66. PubMed ID: 10558440 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Managed health care: great cost savings with minimal legal risks. Postol LP Empl Benefits J; 1992 Sep; 17(3):32-4, 42. PubMed ID: 10121264 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. What's wrong with the ERISA vacuum? Employers' freedom to limit health care coverage provided by risk retention plans. Gostin LO; Widiss AI JAMA; 1993 May; 269(19):2527-32. PubMed ID: 8487417 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Lawmakers urged to close ERISA loopholes. Weissenstein E Mod Healthc; 1992 Dec; 22(49):14. PubMed ID: 10122562 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. ERISA and health plans. Schmidt P; Mazo J; Ladenheim K EBRI Issue Brief; 1995 Nov; (167):1-19. PubMed ID: 10152752 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Back to the '90s--the Supreme Court immunizes managed care. Bloche MG N Engl J Med; 2004 Sep; 351(13):1277-9. PubMed ID: 15385651 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Managing the communication of the employer's promise of benefits. Bauserman JC Employ Relat Today; 1993-1994 Winter; 20(4):475-86. PubMed ID: 10131413 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. The Supreme Court's limitation of managed-care liability. Mariner WK N Engl J Med; 2004 Sep; 351(13):1347-52. PubMed ID: 15385665 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Employer strategies for modifying or terminating retiree benefits in the 1990s. Gordon JA; Hunsaker KA Employee Relat Law J; 1992-1993 Winter; 18(3):413-35. PubMed ID: 10123980 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]