These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10184047)

  • 1. Court blocks discovery of application for medical staff privileges. Alexander v. Superior Court (Saheb).
    Hosp Law Newsl; 1994 Mar; 11(5):8. PubMed ID: 10184047
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Federal court refuses to honor state statutory privilege for proceedings of medical staff credentials committee.
    Schwartz RL
    Health Law Vigil; 1981 Nov; 4(23):4-5. PubMed ID: 10253107
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Important hospital confidentiality interests are strengthened through Illinois court's denial of staff privileges material discovery in malpractice action.
    O'Brien JP
    Health Law Vigil; 1982 Feb; 5(4):5-6. PubMed ID: 10254162
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The hospital's fiduciary duty to its medical staff.
    Vipperman RM
    Med Staff Couns; 1987; 1(2):53-7. PubMed ID: 10284646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Recent decision leaves gap in peer review discovery protections. Pagano v. Oroville Hospital.
    Wisch CJ; Penner IE
    Health Care Law Newsl; 1993 Jul; 8(7):8-12. PubMed ID: 10183883
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Wyoming court interprets state peer review shield law.
    Hosp Law Newsl; 1989 May; 6(7):7-8. PubMed ID: 10294155
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Peer review puzzle. Supreme Court sidesteps appeal to keep records closed.
    Blesch G
    Mod Healthc; 2008 Jan; 38(2):17. PubMed ID: 18260535
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Revocation of operating privileges is against the law! Bavarian Administrative Court decides in favor of the assistant medical director].
    Dobler S
    Unfallchirurg; 1999 Apr; 102(4):319. PubMed ID: 10355348
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Peer-review showdown. High court review could lead to opening records.
    Blesch G
    Mod Healthc; 2007 Dec; 37(48):10. PubMed ID: 18203353
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Courts beginning to address confidentiality of physicians' credentialing records.
    Dawson JS
    Healthspan; 1994 Jun; 11(6):3-5. PubMed ID: 10135152
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Medical staff records exempt from discovery.
    Regan WA
    Hosp Prog; 1982 Apr; 63(4):72-3. PubMed ID: 10254841
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Medical staff bylaws ruled a contract: some observations. Janda v. Madera Community Hospital.
    Hosp Law Newsl; 1999 Jul; 16(9):3-8. PubMed ID: 10621350
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Court rules physician denied fair hearing. Rosenblit v. Superior Court.
    Hershey N
    Hosp Law Newsl; 1993 Mar; 10(5):3-6. PubMed ID: 10183832
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Court upholds rational approach to granting medical staff privileges.
    Kadzielski MA
    Health Prog; 1987 Mar; 68(2):14. PubMed ID: 10280966
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Upcoming Supreme Court decisions crucial for hospitals.
    Weissburg C; Arnold LR
    Health Syst Rev; 1991; 24(1):43-4, 50-1. PubMed ID: 10110616
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. New inroads into confidentiality.
    Chenen AR
    Med Econ; 1982 Aug; 59(17):88-90, 95, 98. PubMed ID: 10257960
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Medical staff privileges: time for another look.
    Sloss PF
    Trustee; 1979 Feb; 32(2):8, 11-3. PubMed ID: 10240315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. California High Court rules on ability to work with others as criterion for medical staff privileges: must be related to patient care.
    Schwartz R
    Health Law Vigil; 1980 Aug; 3(17):1-2. PubMed ID: 10247620
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Confidentiality of peer review records.
    IMJ Ill Med J; 1984 Dec; 166(6):409. PubMed ID: 6150918
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Doc contracts under fire in Calif.
    Shinkman R
    Mod Healthc; 2000 Mar; 30(10):34. PubMed ID: 11010517
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.