109 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10184446)
1. Health care in the courts. R v Cambridge District Health Authority.
Health Care Anal; 1995 Aug; 3(3):240-3. PubMed ID: 10184446
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Judicial review of refusal to fund treatment.
Brahams D
Lancet; 1995 Mar; 345(8951):717. PubMed ID: 7885130
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Lessons for health care rationing from the case of child B.
Price D
BMJ; 1996 Jan; 312(7024):167-9. PubMed ID: 8563539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Health care rationing and the courts.
Delany L
Health Care Anal; 1993 Nov; 1(2):170-3. PubMed ID: 10135597
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Allocating health care resources in an imperfect world.
Parkin A
Mod Law Rev; 1995 Nov; 58(6):867-77. PubMed ID: 11658160
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Infertility treatment: access and judicial review -- R v. Sheffield Health Authority, ex parte Seale.
Grubb A
Med Law Rev; 1996; 4(3):326-9. PubMed ID: 11657155
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Distributive justice and rationing in the NHS: framing effects in press coverage of a controversial decision.
Burgoyne CB
J Community Appl Soc Psychol; 1997 Apr; 7(2):119-36. PubMed ID: 11656682
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Health care rationing. Oregon asked people about moral values.
Crawshaw R
BMJ; 1996 May; 312(7040):1229-30. PubMed ID: 8634594
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Girl with leukaemia will be treated privately.
Dyer C
BMJ; 1995 Mar; 310(6981):687. PubMed ID: 11644671
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Ethics. Did the NHS fail child B?
Nurs Times; 1996 Sep 4-10; 92(36):33-6. PubMed ID: 8868766
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Profoundly diminished life. The casualties of coercion.
Morreim EH
Hastings Cent Rep; 1994; 24(1):33-42. PubMed ID: 8045768
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. When do health care decisions discriminate against persons with disabilities?
Mehlman MJ; Durchslag MR; Neuhauser D
J Health Polit Policy Law; 1997 Dec; 22(6):1385-411. PubMed ID: 9459133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The experimental treatment exclusion clause. A tool for silent rationing of health care?
James FP
J Leg Med; 1991 Sep; 12(3):359-418. PubMed ID: 1748838
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. De facto health-care rationing by age. The law has no remedy.
Kapp MB
J Leg Med; 1998 Sep; 19(3):323-49. PubMed ID: 9775577
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. NHS resource allocation: a question of funding?
McHale J
Br J Nurs; 2011 Jul 28-Aug 4; 20(14):888-9. PubMed ID: 21841679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Is infertility an illness?
Elliston S; Britton A
New Law J; 1994 Nov; 144(6671):1552-3. PubMed ID: 11660173
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Resource allocation in the National Health Service.
Newdick C
Am J Law Med; 1997; 23(2-3):291-318. PubMed ID: 9262758
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The Child B case -- reflections of a chief executive.
Thornton S
BMJ; 1997 Jun; 314(7097):1838-9. PubMed ID: 11644948
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Simple rationality? The law of healthcare resource allocation in England.
Foster C
J Med Ethics; 2007 Jul; 33(7):404-7. PubMed ID: 17601868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Who decides for the child?
Bull Med Ethics; 1999 Jul; No. 149():3-4. PubMed ID: 11657802
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
