129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10184452)
1. FTC, Justice ask for clarification in Marshfield case.
Taulbee P
Healthc Syst Strategy Rep; 1995 Oct; 12(21):1-2. PubMed ID: 10184452
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The minefield after Marshfield: how to avoid antitrust violations.
Caesar NB
Manag Care; 1995 Aug; 4(8):40-5. PubMed ID: 10145014
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The Marshfield Clinic case: the sound of a broken record.
McDonald K
Ann Health Law; 1996; (5):1-31. PubMed ID: 10184656
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Court overturns jury's verdict on Blue Cross antitrust violation claim.
Kazon PM
Bus Health; 1988 Nov; 6(1):44-5. PubMed ID: 10290529
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Is this group an illegal doctor monopoly?
Slomski AJ
Med Econ; 1994 Sep; 71(18):64-6, 69-70, 72 passim. PubMed ID: 10136387
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Antitrust verdict in Marshfield Clinic case still ominous.
Lutes ME; Vanderbilt TB
Physician Exec; 1995 May; 21(5):25-6. PubMed ID: 10184494
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. "Blues interfered illegally with HMO.".
Burda D
Mod Healthc; 1987 Nov; 17(24):12. PubMed ID: 10284683
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The saga of the Marshfield Clinic case.
Hosp Health Netw; 1995 Nov; 69(22):22. PubMed ID: 8528310
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Court amends its opinion in Marshfield Clinic ruling.
Jaklevic MC
Mod Healthc; 1995 Oct; 25(43):24. PubMed ID: 10152104
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Marshfield verdict partly overturned; panel orders retrial.
Jaklevic MC
Mod Healthc; 1995 Sep; 25(39):4-5. PubMed ID: 10151421
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Marshfield Clinic, physician networks, and the exercise of monopoly power.
Greenberg W
Health Serv Res; 1998 Dec; 33(5 Pt 2):1461-76. PubMed ID: 9865229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Feds challenge Marshfield ruling.
Jaklevic MC
Mod Healthc; 1995 Oct; 25(41):33. PubMed ID: 10152052
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. High court's snub brings Wis. antitrust case to close.
Jaklevic MC
Mod Healthc; 1996 Mar; 26(13):6. PubMed ID: 10156135
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Minimizing antitrust risks of Blue Cross and Blue Shield plans.
Steele CJ
J Contemp Health Law Policy; 1988; 4():227-72. PubMed ID: 10288422
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Blues' discount policy seen as antitrust issue.
Burda D
Hospitals; 1986 Nov; 60(21):36. PubMed ID: 3770662
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Health maintenance organizations and the specter of antitrust law.
Ferrari BT; Sponsler TH
Spec Law Dig Health Care (Mon); 1988 Jan; 9(7):7-34. PubMed ID: 10285562
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Judge Posner's RFP: antitrust law and managed care.
Sage WM
Health Aff (Millwood); 1997; 16(6):44-61. PubMed ID: 9444808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Don't fence us in. The Marshfield Clinic ruling may be bad news for integrated delivery.
Barnett AA
Hosp Health Netw; 1995 May; 69(9):36-8, 40. PubMed ID: 7728163
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Antitrust assault on hospital-Blue Cross relations.
Davis CD
Tex Hosp; 1984 Feb; 39(9):46-7. PubMed ID: 10278223
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Washington turns up antitrust heat on doctors.
Slomski AJ
Med Econ; 1991 Aug; 68(15):42-8. PubMed ID: 10112155
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
