109 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10184599)
1. Moving forward on 'ASCUS,' but not there yet.
Naryshkin S
CAP Today; 1996 Mar; 10(3):32, 34, 36. PubMed ID: 10184599
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. [New nomenclature in gynecologic cytology].
Breitenecker G; Dinges HP; Gitsch G
Gynakol Rundsch; 1990; 30 Suppl 1():162-4. PubMed ID: 2079254
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. [On the uniform term determination of the preliminary and minor stages of cervix uteri neoplasms for the area of the German Deocratic Republic].
Philippson U
Zentralbl Gynakol; 1968 Aug; 90(32):1073-8. PubMed ID: 5682201
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The borderline cervical smear.
Hudson E
Cytopathology; 1995 Jun; 6(3):135-9. PubMed ID: 7669923
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. ASCUS: a misnomer.
Cashmore RW
Acta Cytol; 1997; 41(6):1864-5. PubMed ID: 9390163
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The Bethesda system and Pap smear screening.
Miller K
Am Fam Physician; 1995 Feb; 51(2):331-2. PubMed ID: 7840027
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Management of the abnormal Papanicolaou smear.
Appleby J
Med Clin North Am; 1995 Mar; 79(2):345-60. PubMed ID: 7877395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Tests may replace Pap smears.
AIDS Patient Care STDS; 2000 May; 14(5):286. PubMed ID: 10833822
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. [Recommendations in aberrant findings of cytological studies of the cervix uteri].
Vooijs GP
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1987 Sep; 131(38):1662-3. PubMed ID: 3670461
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The 1988 Bethesda system for cervical vaginal cytology: pros and cons.
Barlow JF
S D J Med; 1991 Jun; 44(6):157-8. PubMed ID: 1658929
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Low grade and ASCUS lesions of the cervix: diagnostic difficulties and reproducibility.
Raab SS
Ann Pathol; 1999; 19(5 Suppl):S87-9. PubMed ID: 10599462
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. [Cytological classifications of vaginal smears. Current concepts of complex cytodiagnosis].
Kasabova M
Akush Ginekol (Sofiia); 1984; 23(4):357-64. PubMed ID: 6385754
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The Bethesda System and patient management strategies.
Helmuth RA; Moriarty AT; Schwenk GR
Indiana Med; 1992; 85(6):500-3. PubMed ID: 1431035
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Abnormal Pap smears, ASCUS still ob/gyn puzzle.
Titus K
JAMA; 1996 Oct; 276(13):1014-6. PubMed ID: 8847749
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of two simultaneously obtained cervical cytological smears.
Sedlis A; Walters AT; Balin H; Hontz A; Lo Sciuto L
Acta Cytol; 1974; 18(4):291-6. PubMed ID: 4526248
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. [Nomenclature uniformity and classification of morphological changes in the cervix uteri].
Patol Pol; 1971; 22(2):133-72. PubMed ID: 5570171
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. [ANAES: review of the literature on the reproducibility of low grade lesions and of atypical cells of indeterminate significance (ASCUS). Decision trees on treating abnormal cervical smears. Clinical problems engendered by the diagnosis].
Baldauf JJ; Ritter J
Ann Pathol; 1999; 19(5 Suppl):S82-4. PubMed ID: 10599460
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Back to the negative Pap test: behind the scenes at Bethesda 2001.
Young NA
Diagn Cytopathol; 2002 Apr; 26(4):207-8. PubMed ID: 11933263
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Cytology reports: are the "Pap" classes outdated?
Marcus PB; Justice KL
Tex Med; 1984 Dec; 80(12):38-40. PubMed ID: 6515577
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Proposal for international colposcopic nomenclature.
Audisio T
J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2007 Jul; 11(3):200. PubMed ID: 17596767
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
