134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10184656)
1. The Marshfield Clinic case: the sound of a broken record.
McDonald K
Ann Health Law; 1996; (5):1-31. PubMed ID: 10184656
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The saga of the Marshfield Clinic case.
Hosp Health Netw; 1995 Nov; 69(22):22. PubMed ID: 8528310
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Is this group an illegal doctor monopoly?
Slomski AJ
Med Econ; 1994 Sep; 71(18):64-6, 69-70, 72 passim. PubMed ID: 10136387
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Marshfield antitrust ruling ignored full market analysis.
Glassman ML
Mod Healthc; 1995 Sep; 25(36):64. PubMed ID: 10145181
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Antitrust verdict in Marshfield Clinic case still ominous.
Lutes ME; Vanderbilt TB
Physician Exec; 1995 May; 21(5):25-6. PubMed ID: 10184494
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. FTC, Justice ask for clarification in Marshfield case.
Taulbee P
Healthc Syst Strategy Rep; 1995 Oct; 12(21):1-2. PubMed ID: 10184452
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Don't fence us in. The Marshfield Clinic ruling may be bad news for integrated delivery.
Barnett AA
Hosp Health Netw; 1995 May; 69(9):36-8, 40. PubMed ID: 7728163
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Marshfield verdict partly overturned; panel orders retrial.
Jaklevic MC
Mod Healthc; 1995 Sep; 25(39):4-5. PubMed ID: 10151421
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Wis. insurer suing physicians in reversal of typical roles.
Burda D
Mod Healthc; 1994 Mar; 24(13):33. PubMed ID: 10132355
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Judge in Marshfield appeals case, clarifies views on MFNs, markets.
Healthc Syst Strategy Rep; 1995 Nov; 12(24):5-7. PubMed ID: 10154257
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Court amends its opinion in Marshfield Clinic ruling.
Jaklevic MC
Mod Healthc; 1995 Oct; 25(43):24. PubMed ID: 10152104
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The minefield after Marshfield: how to avoid antitrust violations.
Caesar NB
Manag Care; 1995 Aug; 4(8):40-5. PubMed ID: 10145014
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The response of the dominant firm to competition: the Ocean State case.
Goldberg LG; Greenberg W
Health Care Manage Rev; 1995; 20(1):65-74. PubMed ID: 7744607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Judge Posner's RFP: antitrust law and managed care.
Sage WM
Health Aff (Millwood); 1997; 16(6):44-61. PubMed ID: 9444808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Physician relationships with health maintenance organizations cause antitrust problems.
Rosen BF; Warbasse BW
Healthspan; 1993 May; 10(5):7-8. PubMed ID: 10127752
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. MGMA joins Marshfield's appeal.
Jaklevic MC
Mod Healthc; 1995 Aug; 25(32):32. PubMed ID: 10144478
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Examining exclusionary conduct of HMOs and PPOs: a case comment on Northwest Medical Laboratories v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Oregon.
Levitt DM
Am J Law Med; 1991; 17(3):271-88. PubMed ID: 1785621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Court overturns jury's verdict on Blue Cross antitrust violation claim.
Kazon PM
Bus Health; 1988 Nov; 6(1):44-5. PubMed ID: 10290529
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Economics at heart of Marshfield Clinic case.
Greenberg W
Mod Healthc; 1995 Jul; 25(27):26. PubMed ID: 10143774
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Most Favored Nation clauses require close scrutiny.
Roeder KH
Ga Hosp Today; 1995 Nov; 39(11):3. PubMed ID: 10152770
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
