These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
104 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10184681)
1. Third circuit opens gateway for lawsuits by Bjork-Shiley heart valve patients ... Michael v. Shiley, Inc. Margolis RE Healthspan; 1995 Mar; 12(3):18-20. PubMed ID: 10184681 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Life after Riegel: a fresh look at medical device preemption one year after Riegel v. Medtronic, Inc. Wartman GJ Food Drug Law J; 2009; 64(2):291-311. PubMed ID: 19999286 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Shiley saga leads to improved communication. Farley D FDA Consum; 1994; 28(1):12-7. PubMed ID: 10131486 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Medical device recalls. Spencer P; Zakaib GM Health Law Can; 2001 Aug; 22(1):1-4. PubMed ID: 11550586 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Can the U.S. Food and Drug Administration act against global frauds? The extraterritorial effect of Food and Drug Administration sanctions after Small v. United States. O'Reilly J Food Drug Law J; 2005; 60(3):347-60. PubMed ID: 16304742 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Could it happen again? the Björk-Shiley convexo-concave heart valve story. Blackstone EH Circulation; 2005 May; 111(21):2717-9. PubMed ID: 15927988 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Guide to preemption of state-law claims against Class III PMA medical devices. Whitney DW Food Drug Law J; 2010; 65(1):113-39, ii-iii. PubMed ID: 24475536 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Designing trials for testing prosthetic cardiac valves: a Food and Drug Administration perspective. Sapirstein W Am Heart J; 2001 May; 141(5):861-3. PubMed ID: 11320379 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. [Lessons from a heart valve prosthesis controversy]. Vandenbroucke JP; Grobbee DE Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1998 Jul; 142(29):1648-52. PubMed ID: 9763855 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Qui tam on the lam: Fifth Circuit fires the first salvo--will the Supreme Court be next? Mayo TW Health Care Law Mon; 1999 Dec; ():3-8. PubMed ID: 10788161 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Getting the bad news about your artificial heart valve. Fielder JH Hastings Cent Rep; 1993; 23(2):22-8. PubMed ID: 8463086 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Researchers say they can now spot artificial heart valves that may fail. Kolata G N Y Times Web; 1992 Oct; ():A1. PubMed ID: 11647926 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Medical device recalls from 2004 to 2006: a focus on Class I recalls. Villarraga ML; Guerin HL; Lam T Food Drug Law J; 2007; 62(3):581-92. PubMed ID: 17915400 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Premarket approval and federal preemption of product liability claims in the wake of Medtronic, Inc. v. Lohr. Jarcho DG Food Drug Law J; 1996; 51(4):613-8. PubMed ID: 11797730 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. [Chronicle of a defective heart valve prosthesis]. van der Graaf Y; Kallewaard M; Algra A Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1998 Jul; 142(29):1645-8. PubMed ID: 9763854 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Medical device preemption after Medtronic, Inc. v. Lohr. Neraas MB Food Drug Law J; 1996; 51(4):619-29. PubMed ID: 11797731 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]