223 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10184766)
1. Withholding life-sustaining treatment: the case of Miss D.
Health Care Anal; 1997 Sep; 5(3):237-8. PubMed ID: 10184766
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The role of courts in terminating nutrition and hydration for incompetent patients.
Wintersheimer DC
Issues Law Med; 1995; 10(4):453-65. PubMed ID: 7737850
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Decisionmaking in authorizing and withholding life sustaining medical treatment: from Quinlan to Cruzan.
Keilitz I; Bilzor JC; Hafemeister TL; Brown V; Dudyshyn D
Ment Phys Disabil Law Rep; 1989; 13(5):482-93. PubMed ID: 11654759
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. In the shadow of Karen Quinlan.
Bennett SA
Trial; 1976 Sep; 12(9):36-41. PubMed ID: 11664653
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Should physicians withhold life-sustaining care from patients who are not terminally ill?
Emanuel EJ
Lancet; 1988 Jan; 1(8577):106-8. PubMed ID: 2891943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Ends and means of life: the Supreme Court and withdrawal of nutrition and hydration.
Feenan D
J Ir Med Assoc; 1995; 88(5):152, 151. PubMed ID: 11657627
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Helga Wanglie revisited: medical futility and the limits of autonomy.
Johnson DH
Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 1993; 2(2):161-70. PubMed ID: 8293205
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Care and Protection of Beth.
Massachusetts. Supreme Judicial Court, Hampden
North East Rep Second Ser; 1992 Mar; 587():1377-83. PubMed ID: 12041221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Medico-legal implications of "orders not to resuscitate.
Tecklenburg N
Cathol Univers Law Rev; 1982; 31(3):515-37. PubMed ID: 11649468
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Death by default.
Lindgren J
Law Contemp Probl; 1993; 56(3):185-254. PubMed ID: 10129268
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The ethics of cardiopulmonary resuscitation: another look.
Gillick M
Ethics Sci Med; 1980; 7(3-4):161-9. PubMed ID: 11661902
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The persistence of mind.
Lancet; 1996 Jul; 348(9020):69. PubMed ID: 8676713
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. 2008-2009 National Health Law Moot Court Competition: problem.
Pope T
J Leg Med; 2009; 30(4):443-66. PubMed ID: 19953402
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Terri Schiavo, Son Hudson, and 'nonbeneficial' medical treatments.
Veatch RM
Health Aff (Millwood); 2005; 24(4):976-9. PubMed ID: 16012138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Someone to watch over me: medical decision-making for hopelessly ill incompetent adult patients.
Dippel DL
Akron Law Rev; 1991; 24(3-4):639-80. PubMed ID: 16144098
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. In re Guardianship of Schiavo.
Florida, District Court of Appeal, Second District
Wests South Report; 2003; 851():182-7. PubMed ID: 15179948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The right of elderly patients to refuse life-sustaining treatment.
Annas GJ; Glantz LH
Milbank Q; 1986; 64(Suppl. 2):95-162. PubMed ID: 11649886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Refusal of life-sustaining treatment for terminally ill incompetent patients: court orders and an alternative.
Rubin BL
Columbia J Law Soc Probl; 1985; 19(1):19-68. PubMed ID: 11658755
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. For them rather than by them.
Capron AM
Hastings Cent Rep; 1993; 23(6):30-1. PubMed ID: 8307744
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. In re Edna MF: case law confusion in surrogate decision making.
Shapiro RS
Theor Med Bioeth; 1999 Jan; 20(1):45-54. PubMed ID: 10442053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
