These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

199 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10184766)

  • 41. Withholding of life-sustaining treatment from the terminal ill, incompetent patient: who decides? Part I.
    Suber DG; Tabor WJ
    JAMA; 1982 Nov; 248(18):2250-1. PubMed ID: 7131676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. In re Guardianship of Schiavo.
    Florida, District Court of Appeal, Second District
    Wests South Report; 2001; 800():640-7. PubMed ID: 15179946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Constitutional development of judicial criteria in right-to-die cases: from brain dead to persistent vegetative state.
    Morgan R; Harty-Golder B
    Wake Forest Law Rev; 1988; 23(4):721-65. PubMed ID: 11652556
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. In re Guardianship of Schiavo.
    Florida, District Court of Appeal, Second District
    Wests South Report; 2001; 780():176-80. PubMed ID: 15179941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. In re Guardianship of Schiavo.
    Florida, District Court of Appeal, Second District
    Wests South Report; 2001; 792():551-64. PubMed ID: 15179945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. What role for surrogate decision makers?
    Hubbard H
    Origins; 1993 Feb; 22(34):576-9. PubMed ID: 11652129
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Ethics, the constitution, and the dying process: the case of Theresa Marie Schiavo.
    Gostin LO
    JAMA; 2005 May; 293(19):2403-7. PubMed ID: 15900011
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Withdrawing life-sustaining treatment in patients with persistent vegetative state and without an advance directive.
    Chase P
    S C Nurse (1994); 2004; 11(1):13. PubMed ID: 15625919
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Termination of medical treatment: a judicial perspective.
    Ackerman JW; Pope MC
    J Leg Med; 1982 Jun; 3(2):211-43. PubMed ID: 6981677
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. When should patients not be resuscitated?
    Latimer-Sayer W
    Med Leg J; 1997; 65(Pt. 1):34-6. PubMed ID: 11660738
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Moral consensus in public ethics: patient autonomy and family decision-making in the work of one state bioethics commission.
    Moskowitz EH
    J Med Philos; 1996 Apr; 21(2):149-68. PubMed ID: 8739070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Unilateral withholding and withdrawal of potentially life-sustaining treatment: a violation of dignity under the law in Canada.
    Downie J
    J Palliat Care; 2004; 20(3):143-9. PubMed ID: 15511032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Withholding life-sustaining treatment: the ultimate decision.
    Stone J
    New Law J; 1994 Feb; 144(6635):205-6. PubMed ID: 11652805
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. The limits of proxy decisionmaking for incompetents.
    Buchanan AE
    UCLA Law Rev; 1981; 29(2):386-408. PubMed ID: 11660397
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. The "small beginnings" of euthanasia: examining the erosion in legal prohibitions against mercy-killing.
    Koop CE; Grant ER
    Notre Dame J Law Ethics Public Policy; 1986; 2(3):585-634. PubMed ID: 11650885
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Withdrawal of treatment for minors in a persistent vegetative state: parents should decide.
    Massie AM
    Ariz Law Rev; 1993; 35(1):173-218. PubMed ID: 12645558
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Foregoing life-sustaining treatment for adult, developmentally disabled, public wards: a proposed statute.
    McKnight DK; Bellis M
    Am J Law Med; 1992; 18(3):203-32. PubMed ID: 1283812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Charting a course through difficult legislative waters: tribunal decisions on life-sustaining measures.
    Willmott L; White B
    J Law Med; 2005 May; 12(4):441-54. PubMed ID: 15957587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. New York rule compounds dilemma over life support.
    Belkin L
    N Y Times Web; 1992 May; ():A1, B4. PubMed ID: 11646928
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. A line less reasonable: Cruzan and the looming debate over active euthanasia.
    Grant ER; Cleaver CA
    Md J Contemp Leg Issues; 1991; 2(2):99-256. PubMed ID: 11651215
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.